Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查的替代影像学方法:CT 结肠成像和结肠胶囊。欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会(ESGAR)指南 - 更新 2020 年。

Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastronenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Department of Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2967-2982. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4.

Abstract
  1. ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.2. ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. The timing depends on an interdisciplinary decision including endoscopic and radiological factors. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR suggests that, in centers with expertise in and availability of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), CCE preferably the same or the next day may be considered if colonoscopy is incomplete. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.3. When colonoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with alarm symptoms. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. Because of lack of direct evidence, ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CCE in this situation. Very low quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable alternative to colonoscopy for patients with non-alarm symptoms. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. In centers with availability, ESGE/ESGAR suggests that CCE may be considered in patients with non-alarm symptoms. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.4. Where there is no organized fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based population colorectal screening program, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an option for colorectal cancer screening, providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks, and depending on local service- and patient-related factors. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR do not suggest CCE as a first-line screening test for colorectal cancer. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.5. ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC in the case of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or FIT with incomplete or unfeasible colonoscopy, within organized population screening programs. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. ESGE/ESGAR also suggest the use of CCE in this setting based on availability. Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence.6. ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC with intravenous contrast medium injection for surveillance after curative-intent resection of colorectal cancer only in patients in whom colonoscopy is contraindicated or unfeasible. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in this setting. Very low quality evidence.7. ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC in patients with high risk polyps undergoing surveillance after polypectomy only when colonoscopy is unfeasible. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in post-polypectomy surveillance. Very low quality evidence.8. ESGE/ESGAR recommend against CTC in patients with acute colonic inflammation and in those who have recently undergone colorectal surgery, pending a multidisciplinary evaluation. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.9. ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥6 mm detected at CTC or CCE. Follow-up CTC may be clinically considered for 6-9-mm CTC-detected lesions if patients do not undergo polypectomy because of patient choice, comorbidity, and/or low risk profile for advanced neoplasia. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. Source and scope This is an update of the 2014-15 Guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR). It addresses the clinical indications for the use of imaging alternatives to standard colonoscopy. A targeted literature search was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) or colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.
摘要
  1. ESGE/ESGAR 推荐计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)作为结直肠肿瘤诊断的放射学检查方法。强烈推荐,高质量证据。ESGE/ESGAR 不建议在此情况下使用钡灌肠。强烈推荐,高质量证据。

  2. ESGE/ESGAR 建议如果结肠镜检查不完整,首选或次日行 CTC。时间取决于内镜和放射因素的跨学科决策。弱推荐,低质量证据。ESGE/ESGAR 建议,如果结肠镜检查不完整,在具有胶囊内镜专业知识和可用性的中心,也可以考虑次日行 CCE。弱推荐,低质量证据。

  3. 当结肠镜检查禁忌或不可行时,ESGE/ESGAR 建议 CTC 作为有报警症状患者可接受且同样敏感的替代方法。强烈推荐,高质量证据。由于缺乏直接证据,ESGE/ESGAR 不建议在此情况下使用 CCE。极低质量证据。ESGE/ESGAR 建议 CTC 作为非报警症状患者的结肠镜检查替代方法。强烈推荐,高质量证据。在有条件的中心,ESGE/ESGAR 建议在非报警症状患者中可以考虑使用 CCE。弱推荐,低质量证据。

  4. 在没有组织的粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)为基础的人群结直肠筛查计划的地方,ESGE/ESGAR 建议 CTC 作为结直肠癌筛查的选择,前提是筛查对象充分了解检查的特点、益处和风险,并且取决于当地的服务和患者相关因素。强烈推荐,高质量证据。ESGE/ESGAR 不建议 CCE 作为结直肠癌的一线筛查试验。弱推荐,低质量证据。

  5. 在组织人群筛查计划中,在阳性粪便潜血试验(FOBT)或 FIT 且结肠镜检查不完整或不可行的情况下,ESGE/ESGAR 推荐 CTC。中度质量证据。ESGE/ESGAR 还建议根据可用性在这种情况下使用 CCE。弱推荐,中等质量证据。

  6. ESGE/ESGAR 建议在有结直肠癌根治性切除后,仅在结肠镜检查禁忌或不可行的情况下,使用静脉造影剂的 CTC 进行监测。弱推荐,低质量证据。没有足够的证据推荐在此情况下使用 CCE。极低质量证据。

  7. ESGE/ESGAR 建议在接受结肠镜检查禁忌或不可行的高危息肉患者中,仅在接受结肠镜检查禁忌或不可行的情况下,使用 CTC 进行监测。弱推荐,低质量证据。没有足够的证据推荐在此情况下使用 CCE。极低质量证据。

  8. ESGE/ESGAR 建议在急性结肠炎症和近期接受结直肠手术的患者中,建议进行多学科评估后再进行 CTC。强烈推荐,低质量证据。

  9. ESGE/ESGAR 建议在 CTC 或 CCE 检测到至少一个≥6mm 的息肉时,建议进行内镜息肉切除术。如果患者因患者选择、合并症和/或低高级别肿瘤风险特征而不进行息肉切除术,则可能会考虑在 6-9mm CTC 检测到的病变中进行后续 CTC。强烈推荐,中等质量证据。

来源和范围

这是 2014-15 年欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和欧洲胃肠道和腹部放射学会(ESGAR)指南的更新。它涉及到使用标准结肠镜检查替代方法的临床适应证。进行了有针对性的文献检索,以评估支持使用计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)或结肠胶囊内镜(CCE)的证据。采用了推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)系统来定义推荐的强度和证据的质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验