Suppr超能文献

胰岛素输注计算机计算器直接编程到电子健康记录药物管理记录中。

Insulin Infusion Computer Calculator Programmed Directly Into Electronic Health Record Medication Administration Record.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Nursing Education, Development and Research, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1177/1932296820966616. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized insulin infusion protocols have demonstrated higher staff satisfaction, better compliance with protocols, and increased time with glucose in range compared to paper protocols. At University of California San Diego Health (UCSDH), we implemented an insulin infusion computer calculator (IICC) and transitioned it from a web-based platform directly into the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) of our primary electronic health record (EHR).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 6306 adult patients at UCSDH receiving intravenous (IV) insulin infusion from March 7, 2013 to May 30, 2019. We created three periods of the study-(1) the pre-eMAR integration period; (2) the eMAR integration period; and (3) the post-eMAR integration period-and looked at the percentage of readings within goal range (90-150 mg/dL for intensive care unit [ICU], 90-180 mg/dL for non-ICU) in patients with and without hyperglycemic emergencies. As our safety endpoints, we elected to look at incidence of blood glucose (BG) readings <70 mg/dL, <54 mg/dL, and <40 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Pre-eMAR 69.8% of readings were in the 90-150 mg/dL range compared to 70.2% post-eMAR ( = .03) and 82.7% of readings were in the 90-180 mg/dL range pre-eMAR versus 82.9% ( = .09) post-eMAR in patients without hyperglycemic emergencies. Rates of hypoglycemia with BG <70 mg/dL were 0.43%, <54 mg/dL were 0.07%, and <40 mg/dL were 0.01% of readings pre- and post-eMAR.

CONCLUSIONS

At UCSDH, our IICC has shown to be safe and effective in a wide variety of clinical situations and we were able to successfully transition it from a web-based platform directly into the eMAR of our primary EHR.

摘要

背景

与纸质方案相比,计算机胰岛素输注方案显示出更高的医护人员满意度、更好的方案依从性以及更多的血糖达标时间。在加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校健康中心(UCSDH),我们实施了胰岛素输注计算机计算器(IICC),并将其从基于网络的平台直接过渡到我们主要电子健康记录(EHR)的电子医嘱记录(eMAR)中。

方法

这是对 UCSDH 2013 年 3 月 7 日至 2019 年 5 月 30 日期间接受静脉(IV)胰岛素输注的 6306 例成年患者的回顾性分析。我们创建了研究的三个时期-(1) 预 eMAR 整合期;(2) eMAR 整合期;和 (3) eMAR 整合后期,并观察了有和无高血糖急症患者的目标范围内(重症监护病房[ICU]为 90-150mg/dL,非 ICU 为 90-180mg/dL)读数的百分比。作为我们的安全终点,我们选择观察血糖(BG)读数<70mg/dL、<54mg/dL 和 <40mg/dL 的发生率。

结果

预 eMAR 有 69.8%的读数处于 90-150mg/dL 范围内,而 eMAR 后有 70.2%(=0.03),无高血糖急症患者的预 eMAR 读数中有 82.7%处于 90-180mg/dL 范围内,而 eMAR 后有 82.9%(=0.09)。BG<70mg/dL 的低血糖发生率为 0.43%,<54mg/dL 的发生率为 0.07%,<40mg/dL 的发生率为 0.01%,在 eMAR 前后。

结论

在 UCSDH,我们的 IICC 在各种临床情况下都表现出安全有效,我们能够成功地将其从基于网络的平台直接过渡到我们主要 EHR 的 eMAR。

相似文献

1
Insulin Infusion Computer Calculator Programmed Directly Into Electronic Health Record Medication Administration Record.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1177/1932296820966616. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
Minimization of Hypoglycemia as an Adverse Event During Insulin Infusion: Further Refinement of the Yale Protocol.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Aug;18(8):480-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0101. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Improving IV insulin administration in a community hospital.
J Vis Exp. 2012 Jun 11(64):e3705. doi: 10.3791/3705.
9
Computerized insulin infusion programs are safe and effective in the burn intensive care unit.
J Burn Care Res. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):e114-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182331e39.

引用本文的文献

1
Closed-Loop Medication Management with an Electronic Health Record System in U.S. and Finnish Hospitals.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;20(17):6680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176680.
2
A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Two Computerized Insulin Infusion Protocols.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):635-641. doi: 10.1177/19322968231163584. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Electronic Health Record-Based Decision-Making Support in Inpatient Diabetes Management.
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Sep;22(9):433-440. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01481-0. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
15. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: .
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S193-S202. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S015.
2
Software-guided insulin dosing improves intrapartum glycemic management in women with diabetes mellitus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):191.e1-191.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 8.
3
Evaluation of Several Electronic Glycemic Management Systems.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):60-62. doi: 10.1177/1932296817751748.
4
Comparison of Computer-Guided Versus Standard Insulin Infusion Regimens in Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1932296817750899.
7
Minimization of Hypoglycemia as an Adverse Event During Insulin Infusion: Further Refinement of the Yale Protocol.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Aug;18(8):480-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0101. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Computerization of the Yale insulin infusion protocol and potential insights into causes of hypoglycemia with intravenous insulin.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar;15(3):246-52. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0277. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
10
Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3251-76. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182653269.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验