Zhu Shijie, Zheng Muhan, Yan Ruyu, Tan Zhenlin, Zhao Haiyu, Zhang Jianwu, Peng Jian
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2020 Oct 30;40(10):1415-1421. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.10.06.
To investigate the effect of the combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) on cardiac function and the success rate of AF ablation.
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 56 patients with AF undergoing a one-stop procedure for AF ablation and LAAC in our hospital between May, 2015 and May, 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) at the ratio of 1:1 was used to select 56 control patients undergoing AF ablation at high risk of stroke, for matching with the hybrid procedure group. The perioperative complications, thromboembolic events, recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and cardiac function were compared between the groups.
The two groups of patients were comparable for age, gender, BMI, duration and type of AF, concomitant diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores ( > 0.05). The incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the hybrid procedure group and AF ablation group (17.9% 12.5%, =0.430). Compared with the control patients with AF ablation alone, the patients undergoing the hybrid procedure had a lowered incidence of thromboembolic events, but the difference was not statistically significant (1.8% 3.6%, =1.000). The hybrid procedure did not improve the success rate of AF ablation (OR: 1.338, 95%: 0.451-3.973, = 0.600) but significantly improved the cardiac function parameters including NT-pro BNP (945.3±1401.6 pg/mL 1520.7±2089.1 pg/mL, =0.010), LVEF[(60.8±7.0)% (58.6±7.8)%, =0.044], and left atrial diameter (43.9±7.5 mm 45.6±6.3 mm, =0.076); but the improvement of cardiac function was more obvious in the control patients undergoing AF ablation alone ( < 0.039).
The combination of AF ablation and LAAC is safe but does not improve the success rate of AF ablation. The one-stop procedure can improve cardiac function of the patients, but AF ablation alone can achieve better improvement of cardiac function.
探讨心房颤动(AF)消融与左心耳封堵(LAAC)联合应用对心功能及AF消融成功率的影响。
回顾性分析2015年5月至2019年5月在我院接受AF消融和LAAC一站式手术的56例AF患者的数据。采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)法选择56例有高卒中风险且接受AF消融的对照患者,与杂交手术组进行匹配。比较两组患者围手术期并发症、血栓栓塞事件、房性心律失常复发情况及心功能。
两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、AF病程和类型、合并疾病、CHA2DS2-VASc和HAS-BLED评分方面具有可比性(P>0.05)。杂交手术组与AF消融组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(17.9%对12.5%,P=0.430)。与单纯AF消融的对照患者相比,接受杂交手术的患者血栓栓塞事件发生率较低,但差异无统计学意义(1.8%对3.6%,P=1.000)。杂交手术未提高AF消融成功率(OR:1.338,95%CI:0.451-3.973,P=0.600),但显著改善了包括NT-pro BNP(945.3±1401.6 pg/mL对1520.7±2089.1 pg/mL,P=0.010)、左室射血分数[(60.8±7.0)%对(58.6±7.8)%,P=0.044]和左房内径(43.9±7.5 mm对45.6±6.3 mm,P=0.076)的心功能参数;但单纯AF消融的对照患者心功能改善更明显(P<0.039)。
AF消融与LAAC联合应用安全,但未提高AF消融成功率。一站式手术可改善患者心功能,但单纯AF消融对心功能的改善更佳。