Ling Steven Kin-Ho
Department of Intensive Care, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
Perfusion. 2022 Jan;37(1):14-18. doi: 10.1177/0267659120969020. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
Different cannulation approaches existed for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). We aimed to compare the atrio-femoral (AF) and femoro-atrial (FA) configuration in terms of their flow efficiency and influence on patient outcome.
This was a single-centre, retrospective case control study. Adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and required VV ECMO service at Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, from June 2015 to January 2020 were included. Data were collected from our ECMO database for comparison.
Between June 2015 and January 2020, eight patients received AF configuration and 19 patients received FA configuration. The maximum achieved flow in the AF group was significantly higher than that in the FA group (4.08 ± 0.57 L/min vs. 3.52 ± 0.58 L/min, p = 0.03). The fluid balance in first 3 days of ECMO was significantly lower in the AF group compared to that in the FA group (1.16 ± 2.71 L vs. 3.46 ± 1.97 L, p = 0.02). As well, the chance for successful awake ECMO was statistically higher in the AF group (p = 0.048).
Atrio-femoral configuration in VV ECMO was associated with a higher maximum achieved ECMO flow, less fluid gain in first 3 days of ECMO and more successful awake ECMO.
静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV ECMO)存在不同的插管方法。我们旨在比较心房-股静脉(AF)和股静脉-心房(FA)配置在血流效率及其对患者预后的影响方面的差异。
这是一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究。纳入了2015年6月至2020年1月期间入住香港屯门医院重症监护病房并需要VV ECMO治疗的成年患者。从我们的ECMO数据库中收集数据进行比较。
2015年6月至2020年1月期间,8例患者接受了AF配置,19例患者接受了FA配置。AF组达到的最大血流量显著高于FA组(4.08±0.57L/分钟对3.52±0.58L/分钟,p=0.03)。与FA组相比,AF组ECMO开始后前3天的液体平衡显著更低(1.16±2.71L对3.46±1.97L,p=0.02)。同样,AF组成功实现清醒ECMO的几率在统计学上更高(p=0.048)。
VV ECMO中的心房-股静脉配置与更高的ECMO最大血流量、ECMO开始后前3天更少的液体增加以及更成功的清醒ECMO相关。