Suppr超能文献

2020 年 1 月 23 日至 4 月 13 日期间,190 个国家实施的非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 传播的影响。

Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in 190 countries from 23 January to 13 April 2020.

机构信息

Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, China; Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, China.

Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.066. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of four types of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to contain the time-varying effective reproduction number (Rt) of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

This study included 1,908,197 confirmed COVID-19 cases from 190 countries between 23 January and 13 April 2020. The implemented NPIs were categorised into four types: mandatory face mask in public, isolation or quarantine, social distancing and traffic restriction (referred to as mandatory mask, quarantine, distancing and traffic hereafter, respectively).

RESULTS

The implementations of mandatory mask, quarantine, distancing and traffic were associated with changes (95% confidence interval, CI) of -15.14% (from -21.79% to -7.93%), -11.40% (from -13.66% to -9.07%), -42.94% (from -44.24% to -41.60%) and -9.26% (from -11.46% to -7.01%) in the Rt of COVID-19 when compared with those without the implementation of the corresponding measures. Distancing and the simultaneous implementation of two or more types of NPIs seemed to be associated with a greater decrease in the Rt of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that NPIs can significantly contain the COVID-19 pandemic. Distancing and the simultaneous implementation of two or more NPIs should be the strategic priorities for containing COVID-19.

摘要

背景

评估和比较四种非药物干预措施(NPIs)在控制 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)时变有效繁殖数(Rt)的效果。

方法

本研究纳入了 2020 年 1 月 23 日至 4 月 13 日期间来自 190 个国家/地区的 1908197 例确诊 COVID-19 病例。所实施的 NPIs 分为四类:公共场合强制戴口罩、隔离或检疫、社交距离和交通限制(分别简称强制口罩、检疫、隔离和交通)。

结果

强制口罩、检疫、隔离和交通的实施与 Rt 的变化(95%置信区间,CI)相关,分别为-15.14%(从-21.79%至-7.93%)、-11.40%(从-13.66%至-9.07%)、-42.94%(从-44.24%至-41.60%)和-9.26%(从-11.46%至-7.01%)。与未实施相应措施的情况相比。隔离和同时实施两种或更多种 NPI 似乎与 Rt 更大幅度的下降相关。

结论

我们的研究表明 NPIs 可以显著控制 COVID-19 大流行。隔离和同时实施两种或更多种 NPI 应该是控制 COVID-19 的战略重点。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in 190 countries from 23 January to 13 April 2020.
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.066. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Effectiveness of behavioural interventions to influence COVID-19 outcomes: A scoping review.
Prev Med. 2023 Jul;172:107499. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107499. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013574.pub2.
9
Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19.
J Infect. 2021 Sep;83(3):281-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
10
A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0265289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265289. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

2
The great divide between employees: Clustering employee "well-being" during a pandemic.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 31;20(3):e0294540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294540. eCollection 2025.
4
Productivity Losses due to Health Problems Arising from COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Population-Level Studies Worldwide.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar;23(2):231-251. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00935-8. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
5
Respiratory syncytial virus disease burden in children and adults from Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 16;12:1377968. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377968. eCollection 2024.
6
The Effectiveness of Face Mask Mandates on COVID-19 Transmission in Utah.
Public Health Rep. 2024 Oct 30:333549241290676. doi: 10.1177/00333549241290676.
9
A novel, scenario-based approach to comparing non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies across nations.
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Sep;21(218):20240301. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0301. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Estimating the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Control in Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Sep 7;35(35):e321. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e321.
3
Association Between Statewide School Closure and COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in the US.
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):859-870. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14348.
4
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):410-413. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic.
Infect Dis Model. 2020 Apr 21;5:293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020.
8
The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2.
J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验