United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, 26 W Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH, 45268, United States.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, 26 W Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH, 45268, United States.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 15;278(Pt 2):111478. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111478. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
The causal pathways of stressors that lead to impacts on individuals, populations, and communities of organisms are useful to know for designing alternatives that manage or remediate ecological risks. The ecological risk assessment (ERA) framework (USEPA, 1998b) can help to identify and prioritize management of risks. One key product of the problem formulation step in an ERA, that captures and represents causal knowledge, is the conceptual site model (CSM). The CSM is a graphical depiction of the risk environment that traces the fate and transport pathways of contaminants from sources of contamination (e.g., a leaking storage tank) to receptors (i.e., the ecological endpoints of concern in the risk assessment). The CSM guides the development of methods for assessing ecological risk scenarios and for remediation design alternatives. The qualitative and quantitative aspects of Bayesian networks may support CSM development and risk characterization. Bayesian networks provide a graphical platform geared toward probabilistic modeling making them important candidates for calculating risks in environmental assessments. The diagrammatic representation of causal Bayesian networks (i.e., the directed acyclic graphs) also adds explanatory depth for developing the evidence-base for risk characterization and remediation interventions. We call these qualitative graphs conceptual Bayesian networks (CBNs). The components of CBNs can be used to represent the variables and relationships between sources of contamination, media transfer, bioaccumulation, and risk. The connections help to compose, piece together, and explore hypothesized relationships that bring about high-risk scenarios. Causal pathway analysis of the CBNs provides visualizations of exposure pathways from initial and intermediate sources to receptors. Remediation options that would interrupt or stop the transport of contaminants to ecological receptors can then be identified. Even if the CBN is not quantified, the structures can support mechanistic and statistical designs for exposure and effects analysis and risk characterization and evaluate information needs for resolving uncertainties. This paper will examine these and other unexplored benefits of CBNs to assessment and management of contaminated sites.
压力源导致个体、种群和生物群落受到影响的因果途径对于设计管理或补救生态风险的替代方案非常有用。生态风险评估(ERA)框架(USEPA,1998b)可帮助识别和优先管理风险。ERA 中问题制定步骤的一个关键产品是概念性场地模型(CSM),它捕获并表示因果知识,是风险环境的图形表示,追踪污染物从污染源(例如,泄漏的储罐)到受体(即风险评估中关注的生态终点)的命运和迁移途径。CSM 指导用于评估生态风险情景和修复设计替代方案的方法的开发。贝叶斯网络的定性和定量方面可能支持 CSM 的开发和风险特征描述。贝叶斯网络提供了一个面向概率建模的图形平台,使其成为环境评估中计算风险的重要候选者。因果贝叶斯网络的图形表示(即有向无环图)也为开发风险特征描述和修复干预的证据基础增加了解释深度。我们将这些定性图称为概念贝叶斯网络(CBN)。CBN 的组件可用于表示污染源、介质转移、生物累积和风险之间的变量和关系。这些连接有助于组成、拼凑和探索导致高风险情景的假设关系。CBN 的因果途径分析提供了从初始和中间源到受体的暴露途径的可视化表示。然后可以识别会中断或阻止污染物向生态受体迁移的修复选项。即使 CBN 没有量化,其结构也可以支持暴露和效应分析以及风险特征描述和评估解决不确定性的信息需求的机制和统计设计。本文将探讨 CBN 对污染场地评估和管理的这些和其他未被探索的益处。