Institute of Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Health Care Anal. 2020 Dec;28(4):382-390. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00415-9. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
There is strong evidence suggesting that harm reduction policies are able to reduce the adverse health and social consequences of drug use. However, in this article I will compare two different countries to demonstrate that some social aspects lead to the adoption or rejection of harm reduction policies. In this case, countries where drugs are seen as a security concern are less likely to adopt these harm reduction policies. For that purpose, I will compare Colombia and Uruguay's political, normative, and social aspects, which are considered drivers in the adoption of harm reduction policies, as well as how those factors influence the treatments available for substance abuse disorders.
有强有力的证据表明,减少伤害政策能够降低药物使用带来的不良健康和社会后果。然而,在本文中,我将对比两个不同的国家,以证明一些社会因素会导致减少伤害政策的采纳或拒绝。在这种情况下,将毒品视为安全问题的国家不太可能采纳这些减少伤害的政策。为此,我将比较哥伦比亚和乌拉圭的政治、规范和社会方面,这些方面被认为是采用减少伤害政策的驱动因素,以及这些因素如何影响物质滥用障碍的治疗方法。