Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Allergan plc, Irvine, CA.
Glaucoma Consultants, Towson, MD.
J Glaucoma. 2021 Mar 1;30(3):242-250. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001730.
Incremental addition of intraocular pressure-lowering topical drops is associated with shorter-lasting benefit and higher health-related costs with each additional agent, suggesting a need for new treatment options to improve disease control and reduce treatment burden.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment intensification as a driver of clinical and economic burden in patients receiving topical glaucoma medications for open-angle glaucoma/ocular hypertension.
This retrospective analysis of administrative claims data (January 2011 to July 2017) from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database included diagnosed patients who initiated or intensified treatment with 1 to 4 topical glaucoma medications of a different drug class between January 2012 and July 2015 (index date being the first such event during this period). Patients with prior open-angle glaucoma surgery or an equal or greater number of topical glaucoma medication classes during the preindex period were excluded. Treatment intensification rates and eye-related outpatient costs were assessed over 24 months postindex.
Of 48,402 patients (mean age: 61.4 y), 22,874 (47.3%), 16,214 (33.5%), 7137 (14.7%), and 2177 (4.5%) received a first, second, third, or fourth medication class, respectively, as their first observed initial or intensified regimen. Among cohorts receiving 1, 2, 3, or 4 medication classes, 7.8%, 12.2%, 17.2%, and 22.6% of patients and 12.6%, 18.5%, 25.9%, and 33.7% of patients had subsequent treatment augmentation (class addition or glaucoma procedure, laser or surgical) within 12 and 24 months postindex, respectively. Eye-related outpatient costs over 24 months increased with each additional topical glaucoma medication class at index [mean (SD): $1610 ($3460), $2418 ($4863), $2872 ($5110), and $3751 ($6608) in the 1, 2, 3, or 4 class cohorts, respectively].
Multiple-drop therapies yielded shorter-lasting benefits with each additional agent and were associated with the increased clinical and economic burden.
降眼压局部滴眼剂的增量添加与每种额外药物的持续获益时间更短和更高的健康相关成本相关,这表明需要新的治疗选择来改善疾病控制并减轻治疗负担。
本研究旨在评估局部青光眼药物治疗开角型青光眼/高眼压症患者中治疗强化作为临床和经济负担的驱动因素。
这项来自 IQVIA PharMetrics Plus 数据库的行政索赔数据的回顾性分析(2011 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月)纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 7 月期间开始或强化使用 1 至 4 种不同药物类别的局部青光眼药物治疗的诊断患者(索引日期为该期间内的首次此类事件)。排除了有开角型青光眼手术史或在预索引期内使用了同等或更多种局部青光眼药物类别的患者。在索引后 24 个月内评估了治疗强化率和眼部相关门诊费用。
在 48402 名患者(平均年龄:61.4 岁)中,分别有 22874 名(47.3%)、16214 名(33.5%)、7137 名(14.7%)和 2177 名(4.5%)患者首次观察到初始或强化方案时分别接受了第一、第二、第三或第四种药物类别。在接受 1、2、3 或 4 种药物类别的队列中,7.8%、12.2%、17.2%和 22.6%的患者和 12.6%、18.5%、25.9%和 33.7%的患者在索引后 12 和 24 个月内分别进行了后续治疗强化(药物添加或青光眼手术、激光或手术)。在索引时,随着每个额外的局部青光眼药物类别的增加,24 个月内的眼部相关门诊费用增加[1 类、2 类、3 类或 4 类队列中的平均(SD):分别为 1610 美元(3460 美元)、2418 美元(4863 美元)、2872 美元(5110 美元)和 3751 美元(6608 美元)]。
多种滴眼剂疗法在每个额外药物治疗时产生的获益持续时间更短,并且与临床和经济负担的增加相关。