Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1294-1302. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00998-2. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Physical distancing has been the primary strategy to control COVID-19 in the United States. We used mobility data from a large, anonymized sample of smartphone users to assess the relationship between neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the pandemic. We found a strong gradient between neighbourhood income and physical distancing. Individuals in high-income neighbourhoods increased their days at home substantially more than individuals in low-income neighbourhoods did. Residents of low-income neighbourhoods were more likely to work outside the home, compared to residents in higher-income neighbourhoods, but were not more likely to visit locations such as supermarkets, parks and hospitals. Finally, we found that state orders were only associated with small increases in staying home in low-income neighbourhoods. Our findings indicate that people in lower-income neighbourhoods have faced barriers to physical distancing, particularly needing to work outside the home, and that state physical distancing policies have not mitigated these disparities.
身体距离一直是美国控制 COVID-19 的主要策略。我们使用来自大量匿名智能手机用户样本的移动数据,评估了大流行期间社区收入与身体距离之间的关系。我们发现社区收入与身体距离之间存在很强的梯度。高收入社区的个人在家中的天数大大增加,而低收入社区的个人则增加较少。与高收入社区的居民相比,低收入社区的居民更有可能外出工作,但他们不太可能去超市、公园和医院等地方。最后,我们发现,州政府的命令仅与低收入社区居民增加在家中的天数有关。我们的研究结果表明,低收入社区的人们在身体距离方面面临障碍,特别是需要外出工作,而州政府的身体距离政策并没有减轻这些差距。