Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chair of Food Safety, LMU Munich, Schoenleutnerstr. 8, 85716 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chair of Food Safety, LMU Munich, Schoenleutnerstr. 8, 85716 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Jan 16;337:108932. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108932. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Culturing methods are conventionally applied to investigate the contamination of food with several microorganisms after heat processing. However, with these methods, it is not possible to evaluate whether heat-treated meat products, such as cooked sausages, contained parts of spoiled meat. Therefore, two specific multiplex qPCRs were developed in this study in order to determine the microbiological quality of the raw materials used for these products. The PCR targets focused on four bacterial groups often found on meat (family Enterobacteriaceae, genus Pseudomonas, genus Staphylococcus and species Brochothrix thermosphacta). Specificity as well as sensitivity of the developed multiplex qPCRs, validated by using 68 microbial species, were 100%. The applicability of both multiplex qPCRs compared to culturing methods was performed using 96 meat samples (fresh and naturally spoiled) and 12 inhouse-made "Lyoner" sausages containing variable ratios of spoiled meat (0%, 5%, 12% and 25%; n = 3 for each group). Both methods showed similar results by evaluating the ∆log cfu/g, the relative accuracy and the t-test analysis (p > 0.05). Comparing qPCR results of the different sausage groups, a significant difference between sausages containing fresh meat and sausages containing spoiled meat (12% and 25%) was found only for Pseudomonas and B. thermosphacta in both raw and cooked sausages. The statistical difference between 5% vs. 12% and 25% spoiled meat in cooked sausages, was also found only for these two bacterial groups. The developed multiplex qPCRs were further applied to 30 commercially available "Bologna-type" sausages. The results showed a total of 14 sausages considered to be suspicious for Food Fraud. While the role of Staphylococcus spp. in meat spoilage remains unclear, Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae and B. thermosphacta could together be used as an indicator for "spoiled meat" used in sausages. The developed qPCR systems in this study allow the detection of four relevant bacterial groups in the heated Bologna-type sausages and provide information about the hygienic quality of raw materials used. This method could thus be helpful for screening food suspected of Food Fraud.
培养方法通常用于研究热加工后食品中几种微生物的污染情况。然而,通过这些方法,无法评估经过热处理的肉类产品(如熟香肠)是否含有变质肉的部分。因此,本研究开发了两种特定的多重 qPCR 方法,以确定这些产品所用原料的微生物质量。PCR 靶标集中在通常存在于肉类中的四个细菌群(肠杆菌科家族、假单胞菌属、葡萄球菌属和嗜热解糖梭菌)上。通过使用 68 种微生物物种验证,开发的多重 qPCR 的特异性和灵敏度均为 100%。通过使用 96 个肉样(新鲜和自然变质)和 12 个内部制作的“Lyoner”香肠(含有不同比例变质肉的 0%、5%、12%和 25%;每组 3 个 n)比较培养方法和两种多重 qPCR 的适用性。通过评估 ∆log cfu/g、相对准确性和 t 检验分析(p > 0.05),两种方法得到了相似的结果。比较不同香肠组的 qPCR 结果,仅在新鲜肉香肠和变质肉(12%和 25%)香肠中发现假单胞菌和嗜热解糖梭菌在生香肠和熟香肠中的 qPCR 结果存在显著差异。仅在熟香肠中,5%与 12%和 25%变质肉之间的统计差异也仅存在于这两个细菌群中。开发的多重 qPCR 进一步应用于 30 种市售的“博洛尼亚香肠”。结果表明,共有 14 种香肠被认为存在食品欺诈嫌疑。虽然葡萄球菌属在肉类变质中的作用尚不清楚,但假单胞菌属、肠杆菌科和嗜热解糖梭菌可以一起用作香肠中“变质肉”的指示物。本研究中开发的 qPCR 系统可检测加热后的博洛尼亚香肠中的四个相关细菌群,并提供有关所用原料卫生质量的信息。因此,该方法有助于筛选疑似食品欺诈的食品。