Department of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA
University of Rhode Island, Center for Vector Borne Disease, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 4;87(2). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02370-20.
Deer tick-transmitted (Lyme disease) and (babesiosis) increasingly burden public health across eastern North America. The white-footed mouse is considered the primary host for subadult deer ticks and the most important reservoir host for these and other disease agents. Local transmission is thought to be modulated by less reservoir-competent hosts, such as deer, diverting ticks from feeding on mice. We measured the proportion of mouse-fed or deer-fed host-seeking nymphs from 4 sites during 2 transmission seasons by blood meal remnant analysis using a new retrotransposon-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. We then determined the host that was associated with the infection status of the tick. During the first year, the proportion of mouse-fed ticks ranged from 17% on mainland sites to 100% on an island, while deer-fed ticks ranged from 4% to 24%. The proportion of ticks feeding on mice and deer was greater from island sites than mainland sites (on average, 92% versus 43%). Mouse-fed ticks decreased significantly during year 2 in 3 of 4 sites (most were <20%), while deer-fed ticks increased for all sites (75% at one site). Overall, ticks were more likely to be infected when they had fed on mice (odds ratio [OR] of 2.4 and 1.6 for and , respectively) and were less likely to be infected if they had fed on deer (OR, 0.8 and 0.4). We conclude that host utilization by deer ticks is characterized by significant spatiotemporal diversity, which may confound efficacy tests of interventions targeting reservoir hosts. White-footed mice are thought to be the most important reservoir host for the deer tick-transmitted pathogens that cause Lyme disease and human babesiosis because they are the primary host for immature ticks. Transmission would be reduced, however, if ticks feed on deer, which are not capable of infecting ticks with either pathogen. By directly measuring whether ticks had fed on either mice or deer using a new quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay to detect remnants of host DNA leftover from the larval blood meal, we demonstrate that host utilization by ticks varies significantly over time and space and that mice often feed fewer ticks than expected. This finding has implications for our understanding of the ecology of these diseases and for the efficacy of control measures.
鹿蜱传播的(莱姆病)和(巴贝斯虫病)在北美东部地区越来越多地给公共卫生带来负担。白足鼠被认为是亚成体鹿蜱的主要宿主,也是这些和其他病原体最重要的储存宿主。据认为,当地的传播是由不太有储存能力的宿主调节的,例如鹿,将蜱从吸食老鼠身上转移开来。我们通过血液餐残余分析,使用新的逆转录转座子定量 PCR(qPCR)检测,在两个传播季节的 4 个地点测量了 4 个地点的以鼠为食或以鹿为食的若虫的比例。然后,我们确定了与蜱感染状态相关的宿主。在第一年,以鼠为食的蜱的比例从大陆地点的 17%到岛屿地点的 100%不等,而以鹿为食的蜱的比例从 4%到 24%不等。岛屿地点的以鼠和鹿为食的蜱的比例明显高于大陆地点(平均为 92%对 43%)。在 4 个地点中的 3 个地点,第二年以鼠为食的蜱的比例显著下降(大多数<20%),而所有地点的以鹿为食的蜱的比例都有所增加(一个地点为 75%)。总体而言,当蜱以鼠为食时,它们更有可能被感染(分别为 和 的优势比[OR]为 2.4 和 1.6),而当它们以鹿为食时,它们被感染的可能性较小(OR,0.8 和 0.4)。我们得出的结论是,鹿蜱的宿主利用具有显著的时空多样性,这可能会使针对储存宿主的干预措施的疗效测试复杂化。白足鼠被认为是导致莱姆病和人类巴贝斯虫病的鹿蜱传播病原体的最重要储存宿主,因为它们是幼蜱的主要宿主。然而,如果蜱以鹿为食,鹿不能感染这两种病原体,那么传播就会减少。通过使用新的定量 PCR(qPCR)检测来直接测量蜱是否以老鼠或鹿为食,以检测幼虫血液餐中残留的宿主 DNA 残片,我们证明了蜱的宿主利用在时间和空间上有很大的差异,而且老鼠通常会喂食比预期更少的蜱。这一发现对我们理解这些疾病的生态学以及控制措施的效果有影响。