Suppr超能文献

G8 衰弱筛查工具与老年乳腺癌患者的决策过程。

The G8 frailty screening tool and the decision-making process in older breast cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13357. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13357. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the decision-making process in fit and frail older breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients aged ≥70 years who completed the G8 frailty screening tool (G8) were included in this retrospective study. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, as well as information from geriatric assessment (GA). Treatment decisions were compared with national guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 177 patients, 85 patients were considered fit by the G8 (G8-fit) and 92 patients frail (G8-frail). All G8-fit and 53 G8-frail were proposed for surgery. GA was performed in 34 patients (9 G8-fit; 25 G8-frail) of whom 16 (2 G8-fit;14 G8-frail) were considered frail (GA-frail). 28 out of these 34 patients were considered fit for surgery (including 11 GA-frail); their impairments were unlikely to interfere with surgery or life expectancy. Reasons for adjusting treatment were physical/cognitive condition and patient preference. Ultimately, 123 patients underwent surgery in accordance with guidelines (81 G8-fit;42 G8-frail, p < 0.001). Survival was reduced in G8-frail compared to G8-fit (p = 0.001), but G8 lost its association with mortality in multivariable survival analysis. Among patients undergoing surgery, no difference in mortality was seen between G8-fit and G8-frail (p = 0.996).

CONCLUSION

The G8 is associated with treatment decisions and did not affect survival in patients undergoing surgery. In the decision-making process, the G8 may help and estimates the need for adaptive care.

摘要

目的

评估适合和虚弱的老年乳腺癌患者的决策过程。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了完成 G8 虚弱筛查工具(G8)的年龄≥70 岁的乳腺癌患者。收集了社会人口统计学和临床特征,以及老年评估(GA)的信息。将治疗决策与国家指南进行比较。

结果

在 177 名患者中,85 名患者通过 G8 被认为健康(G8-健康),92 名患者虚弱(G8-虚弱)。所有 G8-健康和 53 名 G8-虚弱均被提议手术。在 34 名患者(9 名 G8-健康;25 名 G8-虚弱)中进行了 GA,其中 16 名(2 名 G8-健康;14 名 G8-虚弱)被认为虚弱(GA-虚弱)。这 34 名患者中有 28 名被认为适合手术(包括 11 名 GA-虚弱);他们的损伤不太可能影响手术或预期寿命。调整治疗的原因是身体/认知状况和患者偏好。最终,根据指南,123 名患者接受了手术(81 名 G8-健康;42 名 G8-虚弱,p<0.001)。与 G8-健康相比,G8-虚弱患者的生存率降低(p=0.001),但在多变量生存分析中,G8 与死亡率失去了关联。在接受手术的患者中,G8-健康和 G8-虚弱患者的死亡率没有差异(p=0.996)。

结论

G8 与治疗决策相关,且不会影响接受手术的患者的生存率。在决策过程中,G8 可能有助于并估计需要适应性护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验