Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Av. Alfredo Balena 190, Santa Efigênia. 30130-100 Belo Horizonte MG Brasil.
Escola de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto. Ouro Preto MG Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Nov;25(11):4259-4268. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320202511.31442020. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
This paper aims to estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular health and the validity of the Brazilian population's self-reported score. This is a cross-sectional, methodological study with 8,943 individual adults and laboratory data from the 2013 National Health Survey. We employed behavioral (body mass index, tobacco use, diet, physical activity, ideal if ≥ 3 ideal factors), biological (tobacco use, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes, ideal if ≥ 3 ideal factors), and cardiovascular health scores (all factors, ideal if ≥ 4 ideal factors). Prevalence of sensitivity and specificity scores and analyses of the self-reported scores were estimated, considering the scores with measured variables as the gold standard. Approximately 56.7% of individuals had ideal values for the measured cardiovascular health score. Sensitivity was 92% and specificity 30% for the self-reported biological score. Sensitivity and specificity scores were, respectively, 90.6% and 97.2% for self-reported behavior. The self-reported cardiovascular health score had a sensitivity of 92.4% and specificity of 48.5%. A little over half of the population had an ideal cardiovascular health score. The self-reported score showed good sensitivity and lower proportions of specificity.
本文旨在评估心血管健康的流行率以及巴西人群自报评分的有效性。这是一项横断面、方法学研究,纳入了 8943 名个体成年人,以及来自 2013 年全国健康调查的实验室数据。我们采用了行为(体重指数、烟草使用、饮食、身体活动、理想情况≥3 个理想因素)、生物学(烟草使用、血脂异常、高血压和糖尿病、理想情况≥3 个理想因素)和心血管健康评分(所有因素,理想情况≥4 个理想因素)。考虑到以测量变量为金标准的评分,我们估计了敏感性和特异性评分的发生率,并对自报评分进行了分析。大约 56.7%的个体具有理想的测量心血管健康评分。自报生物学评分的敏感性为 92%,特异性为 30%。自报行为评分的敏感性和特异性分别为 90.6%和 97.2%。自报心血管健康评分的敏感性为 92.4%,特异性为 48.5%。略超过一半的人群具有理想的心血管健康评分。自报评分显示出良好的敏感性和较低的特异性比例。