Suppr超能文献

一项比较超声引导下腰椎丛阻滞与硬膜外麻醉用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果的随机研究。

A Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Plexus Block and Epidural Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Asian J Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec 1;58(4):131-137. doi: 10.6859/aja.202012_58(4).0003. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) experience severe postoperative pain. The advantage of pain relief by continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) is offset by various adverse effects. Ultrasound guided (USG) continuous lumbar plexus block (LPB) has emerged as an alternative approach for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing THR, especially where epidural is difficult or contraindicated.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial compared USG-LPB with CEA for postoperative pain relief until 48 hours in patients undergoing THR, with 0.5% ropivacaine (15 mL) used as boluses for both CEA and LPB.

RESULTS

The mean time to the first bolus was 380.60 ± 77.66 min in the LPB group whereas it was 307.40 ± 83.60 min in the epidural group (P = 0.002). Thus, patients in the LPB group took more than one hour longer than the epidural group to take their first bolus, which is clinically meaningful besides being statistically significant. The pain score on movement was also significantly lower, and patient satisfaction higher, in the LPB group. There were no significant intergroup differences about motor power, pain at rest, total ropivacaine consumption, and adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

USG-LPB is an effective alternative to CEA combined with general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia after THR.

摘要

背景

接受全髋关节置换术 (THR) 的患者会经历严重的术后疼痛。连续硬膜外麻醉 (CEA) 缓解疼痛的优势被各种不良反应所抵消。超声引导 (USG) 连续腰丛阻滞 (LPB) 已成为 THR 术后镇痛的另一种方法,尤其是在硬膜外麻醉困难或禁忌的情况下。

方法

本随机对照试验比较了 USG-LPB 与 CEA 在 THR 患者中缓解术后 48 小时内疼痛的效果,CEA 和 LPB 均使用 0.5%罗哌卡因(15 mL)作为推注。

结果

LPB 组首次推注的平均时间为 380.60±77.66 分钟,而硬膜外组为 307.40±83.60 分钟(P=0.002)。因此,LPB 组患者首次推注的时间比硬膜外组长一个多小时,这不仅具有统计学意义,而且具有临床意义。LPB 组的运动时疼痛评分也明显较低,患者满意度较高。两组间的运动力量、静息时疼痛、总罗哌卡因用量和不良反应无显著差异。

结论

USG-LPB 是 THR 后全身麻醉联合 CEA 术后镇痛的有效替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验