Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Asian J Anesthesiol. 2020 Dec 1;58(4):131-137. doi: 10.6859/aja.202012_58(4).0003. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) experience severe postoperative pain. The advantage of pain relief by continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) is offset by various adverse effects. Ultrasound guided (USG) continuous lumbar plexus block (LPB) has emerged as an alternative approach for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing THR, especially where epidural is difficult or contraindicated.
This randomized controlled trial compared USG-LPB with CEA for postoperative pain relief until 48 hours in patients undergoing THR, with 0.5% ropivacaine (15 mL) used as boluses for both CEA and LPB.
The mean time to the first bolus was 380.60 ± 77.66 min in the LPB group whereas it was 307.40 ± 83.60 min in the epidural group (P = 0.002). Thus, patients in the LPB group took more than one hour longer than the epidural group to take their first bolus, which is clinically meaningful besides being statistically significant. The pain score on movement was also significantly lower, and patient satisfaction higher, in the LPB group. There were no significant intergroup differences about motor power, pain at rest, total ropivacaine consumption, and adverse effects.
USG-LPB is an effective alternative to CEA combined with general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia after THR.
接受全髋关节置换术 (THR) 的患者会经历严重的术后疼痛。连续硬膜外麻醉 (CEA) 缓解疼痛的优势被各种不良反应所抵消。超声引导 (USG) 连续腰丛阻滞 (LPB) 已成为 THR 术后镇痛的另一种方法,尤其是在硬膜外麻醉困难或禁忌的情况下。
本随机对照试验比较了 USG-LPB 与 CEA 在 THR 患者中缓解术后 48 小时内疼痛的效果,CEA 和 LPB 均使用 0.5%罗哌卡因(15 mL)作为推注。
LPB 组首次推注的平均时间为 380.60±77.66 分钟,而硬膜外组为 307.40±83.60 分钟(P=0.002)。因此,LPB 组患者首次推注的时间比硬膜外组长一个多小时,这不仅具有统计学意义,而且具有临床意义。LPB 组的运动时疼痛评分也明显较低,患者满意度较高。两组间的运动力量、静息时疼痛、总罗哌卡因用量和不良反应无显著差异。
USG-LPB 是 THR 后全身麻醉联合 CEA 术后镇痛的有效替代方法。