Rich Renae K, Jimenez Francesqca E, Puumala Susan E, DePaola Sheila, Harper Kathy, Roy Lonnie, Brittin Jeri
51814HDR Inc., Omaha, NE, USA.
School of Health Sciences, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA.
HERD. 2021 Jul;14(3):65-82. doi: 10.1177/1937586720970198. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
This research aimed to evaluate the quantitative effects of new hospital design on adult inpatient outcomes.
Tenets of evidence-based healthcare design, notably single-patient acuity-adaptable and same-handed rooms, decentralized nursing stations, onstage offstage layout, and access to nature were expected to promote patient healing and increase patient satisfaction, while decreasing adverse events.
Patient healing was operationalized through length of stay (LOS) and patient safety through three adverse events: falls, hospital-acquired infections (HAI), and medication-related events. Standard patient surveys captured patient satisfaction. Patient records from 2013 through 2017 allowed for equivalent time periods surrounding the move to the new hospital in August 2015. Stratified by hospital division where significant, pre/post comparisons utilized proportional hazards or logistic regression models as appropriate; interrupted time series analyses afforded longitudinal interpretations.
Observed higher postmove LOS was due to previously increasing trends, not increases after the move. In surgical and trauma units, a constant increase in falls was unaffected by the move. Medication events decreased consistently over time; medication events with harm dropped significantly after the move. No change in HAI was found. Significant improvement on most relevant patient satisfaction items occurred after the move. Call button response decreased immediately after the move but subsequently improved.
Results did not clearly indicate a net change in adult inpatient outcomes of healing and safety due to the hospital design. There was evidence that the new hospital improved patient satisfaction outcomes related to the environment, including comfort, noise, temperature, and aesthetics.
本研究旨在评估新医院设计对成年住院患者治疗结果的量化影响。
循证医疗设计的原则,特别是单人病情适应病房和同向病房、分散式护理站、舞台后台布局以及亲近自然的环境,有望促进患者康复、提高患者满意度,同时减少不良事件。
通过住院时间(LOS)来衡量患者康复情况,通过三种不良事件来衡量患者安全,即跌倒、医院获得性感染(HAI)和药物相关事件。通过标准患者调查获取患者满意度。2013年至2017年的患者记录涵盖了2015年8月搬入新医院前后的同等时间段。在有显著差异的情况下,按医院科室进行分层,前后比较采用适当的比例风险或逻辑回归模型;中断时间序列分析提供纵向解读。
观察到搬入新医院后住院时间增加是由于之前就呈上升趋势,而非搬入后增加。在外科和创伤科室,跌倒事件持续增加,不受搬迁影响。随着时间推移,药物相关事件持续减少;搬入新医院后,造成伤害的药物相关事件显著下降。未发现医院获得性感染有变化。搬入新医院后,大多数相关患者满意度项目有显著改善。搬入新医院后呼叫按钮响应立即下降,但随后有所改善。
结果并未明确表明医院设计对成年住院患者的康复和安全治疗结果产生净变化。有证据表明,新医院改善了与环境相关的患者满意度结果,包括舒适度、噪音、温度和美观度。