Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):250-260. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004725.
To evaluate the effect of a tracheal intubation safety bundle on adverse tracheal intubation-associated events across 15 PICUs.
Multicenter time-series study.
PICUs in the United States.
All patients received tracheal intubations in ICUs.
We implemented a tracheal intubation safety bundle as a quality-improvement intervention that includes: 1) quarterly site benchmark performance report and 2) airway safety checklists (preprocedure risk factor, approach, and role planning, preprocedure bedside "time-out," and immediate postprocedure debriefing). We define each quality-improvement phase as baseline (-24 to -12 mo before checklist implementation), benchmark performance reporting only (-12 to 0 mo before checklist implementation), implementation (checklist implementation start to time achieving > 80% bundle adherence), early bundle adherence (0-12 mo), and sustained (late) bundle adherence (12-24 mo). Bundle adherence was defined a priori as greater than 80% of checklist use for tracheal intubations for 3 consecutive months.
The primary outcome was the adverse tracheal intubation-associated event, and secondary outcomes included severe tracheal intubation-associated events, multiple tracheal intubation attempts, and hypoxemia less than 80%.From January 2013 to December 2015, out of 19 participating PICUs, 15 ICUs (79%) achieved bundle adherence. Among the 15 ICUs, the adverse tracheal intubation-associated event rates were baseline phase: 217/1,241 (17.5%), benchmark reporting only phase: 257/1,750 (14.7%), early 0-12 month complete bundle compliance phase: 247/1,591 (15.5%), and late 12-24 month complete bundle compliance phase: 137/1,002 (13.7%). After adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering by site, the adverse tracheal intubation-associated event rate significantly decreased compared with baseline: benchmark: odds ratio, 0.83 (0.72-0.97; p = 0.016); early bundle: odds ratio, 0.80 (0.63-1.02; p = 0.074); and late bundle odds ratio, 0.63 (0.47-0.83; p = 0.001).
Effective implementation of a quality-improvement bundle was associated with a decrease in the adverse tracheal intubation-associated event that was sustained for 24 months.
评估气管插管安全套在 15 个 PICUs 中对不良气管插管相关事件的影响。
多中心时间序列研究。
美国的 PICUs。
所有患者均在 ICU 接受气管插管。
我们实施了气管插管安全套作为质量改进干预措施,包括:1)每季度的现场基准绩效报告和 2)气道安全检查表(术前危险因素、方法和角色规划、术前床边“超时”和术后即刻汇报)。我们将每个质量改进阶段定义为基线(实施检查表前 24 至 12 个月)、仅基准性能报告(实施检查表前 12 至 0 个月)、实施(检查表实施开始到达到> 80%的捆绑依从率)、早期捆绑依从率(0-12 个月)和持续(晚期)捆绑依从率(12-24 个月)。捆绑依从性预先定义为连续 3 个月使用检查表进行气管插管的比例大于 80%。
主要结果是不良气管插管相关事件,次要结果包括严重气管插管相关事件、多次气管插管尝试和低氧血症<80%。从 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,在参与的 19 个 PICUs 中,15 个 ICU(79%)达到了捆绑依从率。在 15 个 ICU 中,不良气管插管相关事件的发生率在基线期为 217/1241(17.5%),仅基准报告期为 257/1750(14.7%),早期 0-12 个月完整捆绑依从期为 247/1591(15.5%),晚期 12-24 个月完整捆绑依从期为 137/1002(13.7%)。在调整了患者特征和按地点进行聚类后,与基线相比,不良气管插管相关事件的发生率显著降低:基准:比值比,0.83(0.72-0.97;p=0.016);早期捆绑:比值比,0.80(0.63-1.02;p=0.074);晚期捆绑比值比,0.63(0.47-0.83;p=0.001)。
有效实施质量改进捆绑与不良气管插管相关事件的减少有关,这种减少持续了 24 个月。