Lianyungang No 1 People's Hospital, Jiangsu, China.
Pain Physician. 2020 Nov;23(6):E713-E721.
Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) are 2 of the most popular minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques. We are investigating whether minimally invasive early annular closure can achieve a better clinical effect in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
To compare the clinical and imaging outcomes between MED combined with annular suture and PTED in the treatment of LDH.
A prospective observational study with follow-up of 36 months.
The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang in China.
A total of 135 prospective consecutive patients underwent MED + annular suture or PTED. Patients were assessed postoperatively at 3 days and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The outcome measures were visual analog scales for back pain (VAS-back) and leg pain (VAS-leg) scores, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey bodily pain (SF36-BP), and physical function (SF36-PF) scales, disc height, and recurrence rate.
One hundred and six patients have completed the 3-year follow-up. The operation time and length of stay in the MED + annular suture group were longer than that in the PTED group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). VAS-back score, VAS-leg score, ODI score, SF36-BP, and SF36-PF significantly improved at follow-up time points after surgery compared to before surgery, but no significant differences were found at postoperative and 36 months between the groups. The disc height in the MED + annular suture group was significantly greater than that in the PTED group after 3 months. Within 36-month follow-up, imaging re-herniation was reported in 4 patients in the MED + annular suture group, and 9 patients in the PTED group (P = 0.170). Symptomatic re-herniation occurred in one patient in the MED + annular suture group and in 4 patients in the PTED group (P = 0.190).
First, this was not a randomized controlled trail, which could provide more evidence-based conclusions. Second, we did not accurately measure and compare the amount of nucleus pulposus removed, although less nucleus pulposus was removed in MED + annular suture.
PTED has the advantages of shorter length of incision, shorter operation time, and shorter length of stay. MED + annular suture is associated with greater preservation of disc height, and showed certain advantages of lower recurrence rate, although there was no statistical difference.
经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PTED)和经皮椎间孔内窥镜椎间盘切除术(MED)是两种最受欢迎的微创脊柱手术技术。我们正在研究微创早期环闭是否能在腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的治疗中取得更好的临床效果。
比较 MED 联合环形缝合与 PTED 治疗 LDH 的临床和影像学结果。
前瞻性观察研究,随访 36 个月。
中国连云港市第一人民医院。
共前瞻性连续纳入 135 例患者,分别行 MED+环形缝合或 PTED。术后 3 天、3、6、12、24 和 36 个月进行评估。评估指标为腰背疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS-back)和下肢疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS-leg)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、健康调查简表 36 项条目(SF36)躯体疼痛(SF36-BP)和躯体功能(SF36-PF)评分、椎间盘高度和复发率。
106 例患者完成了 3 年随访。MED+环形缝合组的手术时间和住院时间长于 PTED 组(P<0.001 和 P<0.001)。与术前相比,术后各随访时间点的腰背疼痛 VAS 评分、下肢疼痛 VAS 评分、ODI 评分、SF36-BP 和 SF36-PF 均显著改善,但组间术后和 36 个月时无显著差异。术后 3 个月,MED+环形缝合组的椎间盘高度明显大于 PTED 组。在 36 个月的随访中,MED+环形缝合组有 4 例报告影像学再突出,PTED 组有 9 例(P=0.170)。MED+环形缝合组有 1 例症状性再突出,PTED 组有 4 例(P=0.190)。
首先,这不是一项随机对照试验,因此可以提供更基于证据的结论。其次,我们没有准确测量和比较髓核切除量,尽管 MED+环形缝合切除的髓核较少。
PTED 的优点是切口较短、手术时间较短、住院时间较短。MED+环形缝合与更大程度地保留椎间盘高度有关,且复发率较低具有一定优势,尽管无统计学差异。