Driscoll Maryellen, Dalton Deborah, Jenkins Paul, Tinc Pamela, Murphy Dennis, Douphrate David I, Lundqvist Peter, Pate Michael, Lindahl Cecilia, Meyerhoff Anna, Scott Erika, Carrabba James, Hagevoort G Robert, Sorensen Julie
Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing, The Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safety, Cooperstown, NY, USA.
Department of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2022 Jan;27(1):51-63. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1837703. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
The occupational injury rate of the dairy industry (6.6 per 100 full-time workers) is twice that of the national average across all industries (3.3 per 100 full-time workers). While dairy farms are becoming larger in size and fewer in number, this rate has not changed. A scoping review was conducted to identify published reports of occupational safety interventions in the dairy industry. An additional criterion was that the study included an evaluation of the intervention. Out of 22 articles that met the first criterion (discussion of interventions specific to the dairy industry), 19 met the second of having an evaluative component. These 19 articles corresponded to 16 unique studies, because 4 articles corresponded to the same study. Of the 16 unique studies, only 3 had a comparison of treatment vs. control effects, and none measured the impact of the intervention on injuries and fatalities. Of the 16 interventions, 6 were focused on training or informational campaigns in which the evaluations primarily measured knowledge acquisition. Additionally, none of these studies had a sufficient sample size to compare injury rates as an outcome. Our study demonstrates that the literature lacks any rigorous evaluation of whether dairy safety interventions are making an impact on injury prevention. Given this, it is not possible to determine how work-related injuries and deaths can be prevented in the dairy industry. Recommendations for future research include incorporating rigorous evaluation into research designs and attempting to develop low-cost, unobtrusive methods for collecting data on intermediate and final outcomes.
乳制品行业的职业伤害率(每100名全职工人中有6.6人)是所有行业全国平均水平(每100名全职工人中有3.3人)的两倍。尽管奶牛场规模越来越大、数量越来越少,但这一比率并未改变。我们进行了一项范围综述,以确定已发表的关于乳制品行业职业安全干预措施的报告。另一个标准是该研究包括对干预措施的评估。在符合第一个标准(讨论乳制品行业特定干预措施)的22篇文章中,有19篇符合第二个标准,即有评估部分。这19篇文章对应16项独立研究,因为有4篇文章对应同一研究。在这16项独立研究中,只有3项对治疗效果与对照效果进行了比较,没有一项研究测量了干预措施对伤害和死亡的影响。在这16项干预措施中,有6项侧重于培训或宣传活动,其评估主要衡量知识获取情况。此外,这些研究均没有足够的样本量将伤害率作为一项结果进行比较。我们的研究表明,文献中缺乏对乳制品安全干预措施是否对预防伤害产生影响的任何严格评估。鉴于此,无法确定如何预防乳制品行业的工伤和死亡。对未来研究的建议包括将严格评估纳入研究设计,并尝试开发低成本、不引人注目的方法来收集关于中间和最终结果的数据。