Avilés Carlos, Navia José A, Ruiz-Pérez Luis-Miguel, Zapatero-Ayuso Jorge A
Department of Languages, Arts and Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Departamento de Ciencias Sociales, de la Actividad Física y del Ocio, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:523691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.523691. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this paper is to explain learning in sports and physical education (PE) from the perspective of enactive and ecological psychology. The learning process is first presented from the enactive perspective, and some relevant notions such as sense-making and sensorimotor schemes are developed. Then, natural learning environments are described, and their importance in the human development process is explained. This is followed by a section devoted to the learner's experience in which some research methods are explained, such as neurophenomenology, in addition to self-confrontation, interviews aimed at bringing out the meaning, sensations, and emotions that performers experience when they are immersed in their sport or a PE class. The sections on the ecological approach deal with the attunement, calibration, the education of intention, and the importance of representative experimental designs. The last section addresses the main similarities and differences between the two approaches. Finally, we state our theoretical position in favor of a common project that brings together the main elements of both post-cognitive approaches.
本文旨在从具身认知和生态心理学的视角解释体育和体育教育中的学习。首先从具身认知的视角呈现学习过程,并阐述诸如意义建构和感觉运动图式等相关概念。接着,描述自然学习环境,并解释其在人类发展过程中的重要性。随后是关于学习者体验的部分,除了自我反思之外,还解释了一些研究方法,如神经现象学,以及旨在揭示参与者在沉浸于运动或体育课时所体验到的意义、感觉和情感的访谈。生态方法部分涉及协调、校准、意向教育以及代表性实验设计的重要性。最后一部分探讨了这两种方法的主要异同点。最后,我们表明我们的理论立场,支持一个整合两种后认知方法主要元素的共同项目。