Bernotiene Eiva, Bagdonas Edvardas, Kirdaite Gailute, Bernotas Paulius, Kalvaityte Ursule, Uzieliene Ilona, Thudium Christian S, Hannula Heidi, Lorite Gabriela S, Dvir-Ginzberg Mona, Guermazi Ali, Mobasheri Ali
Department of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Department of Experimental, Preventive and Clinical Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Oct 21;7:572977. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.572977. eCollection 2020.
Biomarkers, especially biochemical markers, are important in osteoarthritis (OA) research, clinical trials, and drug development and have potential for more extensive use in therapeutic monitoring. However, they have not yet had any significant impact on disease diagnosis and follow-up in a clinical context. Nevertheless, the development of immunoassays for the detection and measurement of biochemical markers in OA research and therapy is an active area of research and development. The evaluation of biochemical markers representing low-grade inflammation or extracellular matrix turnover may permit OA prognosis and expedite the development of personalized treatment tailored to fit particular disease severities. However, currently detection methods have failed to overcome specific hurdles such as low biochemical marker concentrations, patient-specific variation, and limited utility of single biochemical markers for definitive characterization of disease status. These challenges require new and innovative approaches for development of detection and quantification systems that incorporate clinically relevant biochemical marker panels. Emerging platforms and technologies that are already on the way to implementation in routine diagnostics and monitoring of other diseases could potentially serve as good technological and strategic examples for better assessment of OA. State-of-the-art technologies such as advanced multiplex assays, enhanced immunoassays, and biosensors ensure simultaneous screening of a range of biochemical marker targets, the expansion of detection limits, low costs, and rapid analysis. This paper explores the implementation of such technologies in OA research and therapy. Application of novel immunoassay-based technologies may shed light on poorly understood mechanisms in disease pathogenesis and lead to the development of clinically relevant biochemical marker panels. More sensitive and specific biochemical marker immunodetection will complement imaging biomarkers and ensure evidence-based comparisons of intervention efficacy. We discuss the challenges hindering the development, testing, and implementation of new OA biochemical marker assays utilizing emerging multiplexing technologies and biosensors.
生物标志物,尤其是生化标志物,在骨关节炎(OA)研究、临床试验和药物开发中具有重要意义,并且在治疗监测方面有更广泛应用的潜力。然而,它们在临床环境中对疾病诊断和随访尚未产生显著影响。尽管如此,在OA研究和治疗中用于检测和测量生化标志物的免疫测定法的开发仍是一个活跃的研发领域。对代表低度炎症或细胞外基质周转的生化标志物进行评估,可能有助于OA的预后,并加快针对特定疾病严重程度的个性化治疗的开发。然而,目前的检测方法未能克服一些特定障碍,如生化标志物浓度低、患者个体差异以及单一生化标志物对疾病状态进行明确表征的效用有限。这些挑战需要新的创新方法来开发检测和定量系统,该系统应纳入临床相关的生化标志物组合。正在常规诊断和其他疾病监测中实施的新兴平台和技术,有可能为更好地评估OA提供良好的技术和战略范例。先进的多重分析、增强免疫测定和生物传感器等先进技术可确保同时筛选一系列生化标志物靶点、扩大检测限、降低成本并实现快速分析。本文探讨了这些技术在OA研究和治疗中的应用。基于新型免疫测定技术的应用可能会揭示疾病发病机制中尚未充分理解的机制,并导致开发临床相关的生化标志物组合。更灵敏和特异的生化标志物免疫检测将补充成像生物标志物,并确保基于证据的干预疗效比较。我们讨论了利用新兴的多重技术和生物传感器开发、测试和实施新的OA生化标志物检测方法所面临的挑战。