Deding Ulrik, Kaalby Lasse, Bøggild Henrik, Plantener Eva, Wollesen Mie Kruse, Kobaek-Larsen Morten, Hansen Siri Juul, Baatrup Gunnar
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 13;12(11):3367. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113367.
Following incomplete colonoscopy (IC) patients often undergo computed tomography colonography (CTC), but colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) may be an alternative. We compared the completion rate, sensitivity and diagnostic yield for polyp detection from CCE and CTC following IC. A systematic literature search resulted in twenty-six studies. Extracted data included inter alia, complete/incomplete investigations and polyp findings. Pooled estimates of completion rates of CCE and CTC and complete colonic view rates (CCE reaching the most proximal point of IC) of CCE were calculated. Per patient diagnostic yields of CCE and CTC were calculated stratified by polyp sizes. CCE completion rate and complete colonic view rate were 76% (CI 95% 68-84%) and 90% (CI 95% 83-95%). CTC completion rate was 98% (CI 95% 96-100%). Diagnostic yields of CTC and CCE were 10% (CI 95% 7-15%) and 37% (CI 95% 30-43%) for any size, 13% (CI 95% 9-18%) and 21% (CI 95% 12-32%) for >5-mm and 4% (CI 95% 2-7%) and 9% (CI 95% 3-17%) for >9-mm polyps. No study performed a reference standard follow-up after CCE/CTC in individuals without findings, rendering sensitivity calculations unfeasible. The increased diagnostic yield of CCE could outweigh its slightly lower complete colonic view rate compared to the superior CTC completion rate. Hence, CCE following IC appears feasible for an introduction to clinical practice. Therefore, randomized studies investigating CCE and/or CTC following incomplete colonoscopy with a golden standard reference for the entire population enabling estimates for sensitivity and specificity are needed.
在结肠镜检查未完成(IC)后,患者通常会接受计算机断层扫描结肠成像(CTC),但结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)可能是一种替代方法。我们比较了IC后CCE和CTC对息肉检测的完成率、敏感性和诊断率。系统的文献检索产生了26项研究。提取的数据尤其包括完整/不完整的检查和息肉发现情况。计算了CCE和CTC的完成率以及CCE的全结肠观察率(CCE到达IC的最近端点)的合并估计值。按息肉大小分层计算了CCE和CTC的个体诊断率。CCE完成率和全结肠观察率分别为76%(95%CI 68 - 84%)和90%(95%CI 83 - 95%)。CTC完成率为98%(95%CI 96 - 100%)。对于任何大小的息肉,CTC和CCE的诊断率分别为10%(95%CI 7 - 15%)和37%(95%CI 30 - 43%);对于>5 mm的息肉,分别为13%(95%CI 9 - 18%)和21%(95%CI 12 - 32%);对于>9 mm的息肉,分别为4%(95%CI 2 - 7%)和9%(95%CI 3 - 17%)。没有研究对无发现个体在CCE/CTC后进行参考标准随访,因此无法进行敏感性计算。与更高的CTC完成率相比,CCE诊断率的提高可能超过其略低的全结肠观察率。因此,IC后的CCE似乎可引入临床实践。所以,需要进行随机研究,以金标准为参考,调查未完成结肠镜检查后的CCE和/或CTC,从而能够估计敏感性和特异性。