Department of Neurosurgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu.
Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e979-e984. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.063. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
The necessity of partial occipital condyle (OC) resection for lesions in the ventral craniocervical junction is debatable. This study's purpose was to compare the surgical exposure of the classic far-lateral approach (FLA) and transcondylar FLA.
The classic FLA and transcondylar FLA were performed in 12 human cadaveric heads (24 sides). The surgical corridor of 3 levels (a: vagus nerve, b: from the midpoint of proximal ends of the vagus and hypoglossal nerves to the midpoint of the distal ends of each nerve, c: hypoglossal nerve) and the maneuverability (the area between neurovascular structures that limits instrumental maneuvers) were measured after each approach.
The surgical corridors were significantly greater in transcondylar FLA than in classic FLA (a: 14.4 ± 3.4 mm vs. 17.1 ± 4.4 mm, P < 0.001; b: 8.6 ± 2.9 mm vs. 11.2 ± 4.1 mm, P < 0.001; c: 5.5 ± 2.2 mm vs. 7.7 ± 2.8 mm, P < 0.001). Transcondylar FLA also provided greater maneuverability than classic FLA (73.2 ± 23.9 mm vs. 94.9 ± 32.2 mm, P < 0.001). The increased length of the surgical corridor was greatest in a (a: 2.7 ± 2.3 mm, b: 2.6 ± 2.0 mm, c: 2.2 ± 1.4 mm). However, the rate of increase was greatest in c (a: 18.9 ± 16.4%, b: 30.4 ± 26.2%, c: 44.8 ± 27.2%). The area of increased maneuverability was 21.7 ± 20.3 mm (31.1 ± 27.8%) after partial OC resection.
Transcondylar FLA can significantly increase surgical exposure compared with the classic FLA, although also increasing surgical complications. Therefore, the surgical approach should be individualized according to each lesion and patient. The results of our study may assist in surgical decision-making regarding the need for OC resection.
对于颅颈腹侧交界区的病变,行部分枕骨髁切除术的必要性存在争议。本研究旨在比较经典远外侧入路(FLA)和经髁突 FLA 的手术显露。
在 12 个人体头颅标本(24 侧)上进行了经典 FLA 和经髁突 FLA。测量了每个入路后的 3 个水平(a:迷走神经,b:从迷走神经和舌下神经近端终点的中点到每个神经远端终点的中点,c:舌下神经)的手术通道和可操作性(限制器械操作的神经血管结构之间的区域)。
经髁突 FLA 的手术通道明显大于经典 FLA(a:14.4 ± 3.4mm 比 17.1 ± 4.4mm,P<0.001;b:8.6 ± 2.9mm 比 11.2 ± 4.1mm,P<0.001;c:5.5 ± 2.2mm 比 7.7 ± 2.8mm,P<0.001)。经髁突 FLA 也提供了比经典 FLA 更大的可操作性(73.2 ± 23.9mm 比 94.9 ± 32.2mm,P<0.001)。手术通道的增加长度在 a 处最大(a:2.7 ± 2.3mm,b:2.6 ± 2.0mm,c:2.2 ± 1.4mm)。然而,增加率在 c 处最大(a:18.9 ± 16.4%,b:30.4 ± 26.2%,c:44.8 ± 27.2%)。行部分枕骨髁切除术后,可操作性增加的区域为 21.7 ± 20.3mm(31.1 ± 27.8%)。
与经典 FLA 相比,经髁突 FLA 可显著增加手术显露,但同时也增加了手术并发症。因此,应根据每个病变和患者的情况个体化选择手术入路。本研究的结果可能有助于枕骨髁切除术的手术决策。