Kent Law School, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NS, UK.
4 Paper Buildings, Temple, London EC4Y 7EX, UK.
Med Law Rev. 2021 Aug 9;29(1):172-184. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa037.
This comment piece explores the decision in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14. It argues that despite notable shifts in public policy in respect of the acceptability of surrogacy as a means of family formation in the past twenty years, the Supreme Court has taken a step too far in deciding that foreign commercial surrogacy is as widely socially accepted. This impacts on the reasonableness of any claim for damages in negligence for the costs of commercial surrogacy. It is posited that the issue of whether damages for foreign commercial surrogacy are reasonable or not will be the key battleground in future negligence cases of this type.
这篇评论文章探讨了惠廷顿医院 NHS 信托诉 XX[2020]UKSC 14 案的判决。它认为,尽管在过去二十年中,公众政策在代孕作为家庭形成手段的可接受性方面发生了显著变化,但最高法院在决定外国商业代孕被广泛社会接受方面走得太远了。这影响了对商业代孕费用的疏忽赔偿的任何赔偿要求的合理性。有人认为,外国商业代孕的赔偿是否合理将是未来此类疏忽案件的关键战场。