Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01889-x.
Older individuals are at increased risk of a severe and lethal course of COVID-19. They have typically been advised to practice particularly restrictive social distancing ('cocooning'), which has sparked much debate on the consequences for their mental wellbeing. We aimed to provide evidence by conducting a representative survey among the German old population during COVID-19 lockdown.
A computer-assisted standardized telephone interview was conducted in a randomly selected and representative sample of the German old age population (n = 1005; age ≥ 65 years) during the first lockdown in April 2020. Assessments included sociodemographic factors, aspects of the personal life situation during lockdown, attitudes towards COVID-19, and standardized screening measures on depression, anxiety, somatization, overall psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory/BSI-18) and loneliness (UCLA 3-item loneliness scale). Sampling-weighted descriptive statistics and multiple multivariable regression analyses were conducted.
Participants were M = 75.5 (SD = 7.1) years old; 56.3% were women. At data collection, COVID-19 lockdown had been in force for M = 28.0 (SD = 4.8) days. Overall, older individuals were worried about COVID-19, but supportive of the lockdown. Mean BSI-18 scores were 1.4 for depression, 1.6 for anxiety and 2.2 for somatization as well as 5.1 for global psychological distress. These figures did not indicate worse mental wellbeing, given normative values established by studies before the pandemic (2.0, 1.6, 2.4, 6.0, respectively). The prevalence of loneliness was 13.1%, which also fell within a range of estimates reported by studies before the pandemic. There were only few significant associations of aspects of the personal life situation during lockdown and attitudes towards COVID-19 with mental wellbeing. Resilience explained a large amount of variance.
In the short-term, the mental wellbeing of the German old age population was largely unaltered during COVID-19 lockdown, suggesting resilience against the challenging pandemic situation. Our results refute common ageist stereotypes of "the weak and vulnerable older adults" that were present during the pandemic. Long-term observations are needed to provide robust evidence.
老年人感染 COVID-19 后出现严重和致命后果的风险更高。他们通常被建议采取特别严格的社交隔离措施(“隔离”),这引发了关于对其心理健康影响的大量争论。我们旨在通过在 COVID-19 封锁期间对德国老年人群进行代表性调查来提供证据。
在 2020 年 4 月 COVID-19 封锁期间,在随机选择的具有代表性的德国老年人群体(n=1005;年龄≥65 岁)中进行了计算机辅助标准化电话访谈。评估包括社会人口统计学因素、封锁期间个人生活状况的各个方面、对 COVID-19 的态度以及抑郁、焦虑、躯体化、总体心理困扰(Brief Symptom Inventory/BSI-18)和孤独感(UCLA 3 项孤独量表)的标准化筛查措施。进行了采样加权描述性统计和多重多变量回归分析。
参与者的平均年龄为 75.5(SD=7.1)岁;56.3%为女性。在数据收集时,COVID-19 封锁已经实施了 M=28.0(SD=4.8)天。总体而言,老年人对 COVID-19 感到担忧,但支持封锁。BSI-18 的平均得分为 1.4 分(抑郁)、1.6 分(焦虑)和 2.2 分(躯体化)以及 5.1 分(总体心理困扰)。鉴于大流行前研究确定的常模值(分别为 2.0、1.6、2.4、6.0),这些数字并未表明心理健康状况恶化。孤独感的患病率为 13.1%,这也在大流行前研究报告的估计范围内。封锁期间个人生活状况的各个方面和对 COVID-19 的态度与心理健康之间只有很少的显著关联。适应力解释了大量的方差。
在短期内,COVID-19 封锁期间德国老年人口的心理健康状况基本没有改变,表明他们对具有挑战性的大流行情况具有适应力。我们的结果反驳了大流行期间存在的“脆弱的老年人”这种常见的年龄歧视刻板印象。需要进行长期观察以提供有力的证据。