From the Department of Surgery.
Department of Anesthesiology.
Anesth Analg. 2021 Dec 1;133(6):1406-1414. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005282.
Understanding the impact of key metrics on operating room (OR) efficiency is important to optimize utilization and reduce costs, particularly in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers. The aim of this study was to assess the association between commonly used efficiency metrics and scheduled end-time accuracy.
Data from patients who underwent surgery from May 2018 to June 2019 at an academic freestanding ambulatory surgery center was extracted from the medical record. Unique operating room days (ORDs) were analyzed to determine (1) duration of first case delays, (2) turnover times (TOT), and (3) scheduled case duration accuracies. Spearman's correlation coefficients and mixed-effects multivariable linear regression were used to assess the association of each metric with scheduled end-time accuracy.
There were 1378 cases performed over 300 unique ORDs. There were 86 (28.7%) ORDs with a first case delay, mean (standard deviation [SD]) 11.2 minutes (15.1 minutes), range of 2-101 minutes; the overall mean (SD) TOT was 28.1 minutes (19.9 minutes), range of 6-83 minutes; there were 640 (46.4%) TOT >20 minutes; the overall mean (SD) case duration accuracy was -6.6 minutes (30.3 minutes), range of -114 to 176; and there were 389 (28.2%) case duration accuracies ≥30 minutes. The mean (SD) scheduled end-time accuracy was 6.9 minutes (68.3 minutes), range of -173 to 229 minutes; 48 (15.9%) ORDs ended ≥1 hour before scheduled end-time and 56 (18.6%) ORDs ended ≥1 hour after scheduled end-time. The total case duration accuracy was strongly correlated with the scheduled end-time accuracy (r = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.89, P < .0001), while the total first case delay minutes (r = 0.12, 95% CI, 0.01-0.21, P = .04) and total turnover time (r = -0.16, 95% CI, 0.21-0.05, P = .005) were less relevant. Case duration accuracy had the highest association with the dependent variable (0.95 minutes changed in the difference between actual and schedule end time per minute increase in case duration accuracy, 95% CI, 0.90-0.99, P < .0001), compared to turnover time (estimate = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99, P < .0001) and first case delay time (estimate = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.56-1.11, P < .0001).
Standard efficiency metrics are similarly associated with scheduled end-time accuracy, and addressing problems in each is requisite to having an efficient ambulatory surgery center. Pursuing methods to narrow the gap between scheduled and actual case duration may result in a more productive enterprise.
了解关键指标对手术室 (OR) 效率的影响对于优化利用和降低成本非常重要,尤其是在独立的日间手术中心。本研究旨在评估常用效率指标与预定结束时间准确性之间的关联。
从 2018 年 5 月至 2019 年 6 月在学术性独立日间手术中心接受手术的患者的病历中提取数据。分析独特的手术室日 (ORD),以确定 (1) 第一例延迟的持续时间,(2) 周转时间 (TOT),和 (3) 预定病例持续时间准确性。采用 Spearman 相关系数和混合效应多元线性回归评估每个指标与预定结束时间准确性的相关性。
共有 1378 例手术在 300 个独特的 ORD 中进行。有 86 个 ORD (28.7%) 存在第一例延迟,平均 (标准偏差 [SD]) 为 11.2 分钟 (15.1 分钟),范围为 2-101 分钟;总 TOT 的平均 (SD) 为 28.1 分钟 (19.9 分钟),范围为 6-83 分钟;有 640 个 (46.4%) TOT >20 分钟;总病例持续时间准确性的平均 (SD) 为-6.6 分钟 (30.3 分钟),范围为-114 至 176 分钟;有 389 个 (28.2%) 病例持续时间准确性≥30 分钟。预定结束时间准确性的平均 (SD) 为 6.9 分钟 (68.3 分钟),范围为-173 至 229 分钟;48 (15.9%) ORD 提前预定结束时间≥1 小时结束,56 (18.6%) ORD 提前预定结束时间≥1 小时结束。总病例持续时间准确性与预定结束时间准确性呈强相关性 (r = 0.87,95%置信区间 [CI],0.84-0.89,P <.0001),而总第一例延迟时间 (r = 0.12,95% CI,0.01-0.21,P =.04) 和总周转时间 (r = -0.16,95% CI,0.21-0.05,P =.005) 的相关性较弱。病例持续时间准确性与因病例持续时间准确性每分钟增加 1 分钟而导致的实际与预定结束时间之间的差异的因变量的相关性最高 (0.95 分钟,95% CI,0.90-0.99,P <.0001),与周转时间 (估计值 = 0.87,95% CI,0.75-0.99,P <.0001) 和第一例延迟时间 (估计值 = 0.83,95% CI,0.56-1.11,P <.0001) 相比。
标准效率指标与预定结束时间准确性具有相似的相关性,解决每个指标中的问题是日间手术中心高效运行的必要条件。寻求缩小预定和实际病例持续时间之间差距的方法可能会使企业更具生产力。