From the Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Clin Nucl Med. 2021 Feb 1;46(2):125-132. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003411.
The aims of this study were to determine the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in vulvar cancer patients and to extract summary estimates of its diagnostic performance for preoperative lymph node staging.
PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify studies evaluating 18F-FDG PET/CT in vulvar cancer patients. The assessment of methodological quality of the included articles was performed. Per-patient and per-groin pooled estimates, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated.
Ten articles were included in the systematic review, 7 among which evaluated the diagnostic performance of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node staging. Qualitative per-patient analysis (72 patients from 4 studies) resulted in estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and DOR of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.44-0.95), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.76-1.04), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.66-1.06), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.56-0.97), and 10.49 (95% CI, 1.68-65.50), respectively. Qualitative per-groin analysis (245 groins from 5 studies) resulted in estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and DOR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.94), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55-0.85), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), and 19.43 (95% CI, 6.40-58.95), respectively.
Despite limited literature data, this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that a negative preoperative PET/CT scan may exclude groin metastases in at least early-stage vulvar cancer patients currently unfit for sentinel node biopsy and select those eligible for a less invasive surgical treatment. A positive PET/CT result should otherwise be interpreted with caution. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and to evaluate the diagnostic value of standardized semiquantitative analysis compared with the qualitative one.
本研究旨在确定 18F-FDG PET/CT 在外阴癌患者中的作用,并提取其术前淋巴结分期诊断性能的汇总估计值。
检索了 PubMed/Medline 和 Embase 数据库,以确定评估 18F-FDG PET/CT 在外阴癌患者中应用的研究。对纳入文章的方法学质量进行了评估。计算了每位患者和每个腹股沟区的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断比值比(DOR)的汇总估计值,置信区间(CI)为 95%。
系统评价纳入了 10 篇文章,其中 7 篇评估了术前 18F-FDG PET/CT 对淋巴结分期的诊断性能。对 7 项研究的 72 名患者进行了定性的每位患者分析,得出的汇总估计敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和 DOR 分别为 0.70(95%CI,0.44-0.95)、0.90(95%CI,0.76-1.04)、0.86(95%CI,0.66-1.06)、0.77(95%CI,0.56-0.97)和 10.49(95%CI,1.68-65.50)。对 5 项研究的 245 个腹股沟区进行了定性的每个腹股沟区分析,得出的汇总估计敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和 DOR 分别为 0.76(95%CI,0.57-0.94)、0.88(95%CI,0.82-0.94)、0.70(95%CI,0.55-0.85)、0.92(95%CI,0.86-0.97)和 19.43(95%CI,6.40-58.95)。
尽管文献数据有限,但本系统评价和荟萃分析显示,对于目前不适合前哨淋巴结活检的早期外阴癌患者,阴性术前 PET/CT 扫描可能排除腹股沟转移,并选择适合微创治疗的患者。否则,应谨慎解释阳性 PET/CT 结果。需要更大的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果,并评估标准化半定量分析与定性分析相比的诊断价值。