Suppr超能文献

非手术中心采用机械循环支持的高风险“保护性”经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——亚洲早期经验

High-Risk "Protected" Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Non-Surgical Center - An Early Asian Experience.

作者信息

Li Ki Fung Cliff, Ho Hee Hwa, Jafary Fahim H, Ong Paul Jau Lueng

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308444.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020 Nov;36(6):675-680. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202011_36(6).20200810A.

Abstract

High-risk "protected" percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, particularly the Impella axial pump, has emerged as a viable treatment option for high-risk patients with satisfactory clinical outcomes. High-risk and complex interventions have mostly remained within the domain of surgical centers. We report on an early "protected" PCI experience using MCS with the Impella flow pump at a high-volume PCI hospital without on-site surgery. A total of 5 patients underwent elective "protected" PCI utilizing MCS with Impella at our institution. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 28 ± 10% and all patients had triple vessel coronary artery disease with the majority having a high SYNTAX score. Device implantation and procedural success were achieved in all cases with no intraprocedural or access site complications. All patients were alive at 30 days and clinically well. The Impella unloads the ventricle, improves forward cardiac output and lowers myocardial oxygen demand, thereby improving mean arterial pressure and coronary perfusion. Device insertion is relatively quick and the "learning curve" is short, centering mainly around managing large bore access. Our limited experience suggests that not only is high-risk PCI with Impella support feasible in a non-surgical center, but that it may be crucial to enable success.

摘要

使用机械循环支持(MCS)设备,特别是Impella轴流泵进行的高风险“保护性”经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),已成为高危患者可行的治疗选择,临床结果令人满意。高风险和复杂的介入治疗大多仍局限于外科中心。我们报告了在一家没有现场手术的高容量PCI医院使用Impella流量泵进行MCS的早期“保护性”PCI经验。共有5例患者在我们机构接受了使用Impella进行MCS的择期“保护性”PCI。平均左心室射血分数为28±10%,所有患者均患有三支冠状动脉疾病,大多数患者SYNTAX评分较高。所有病例均成功植入设备并完成手术,无术中或穿刺部位并发症。所有患者在30天时均存活且临床状况良好。Impella可减轻心室负荷,改善心脏前向输出并降低心肌氧需求,从而提高平均动脉压和冠状动脉灌注。设备插入相对较快,“学习曲线”较短,主要围绕大口径穿刺管理。我们有限的经验表明,不仅在非手术中心使用Impella支持进行高风险PCI是可行的,而且这可能是取得成功的关键。

相似文献

4
Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 2;11:1342409. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1342409. eCollection 2024.
6
Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 4;7(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214. eCollection 2020.
8
A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Heart Int. 2020 Dec 29;14(2):92-99. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92. eCollection 2020.
9
A new iteration for the single-access large-bore technique during Impella supported complex and high-risk coronary intervention: a case report.
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Oct 26;5(11):ytab428. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab428. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
Short term outcomes of Impella circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):27-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29757. Epub 2021 May 24.

本文引用的文献

4
Heart failure as a general pandemic in Asia.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Sep;17(9):884-92. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.319. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
Yes, We Can! (Should We?).
Circulation. 2015 Aug 4;132(5):365-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017848. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 1;80(5):717-25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23403. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验