Suppr超能文献

COVID-19患者通气支持管理的全球现行做法:一项国际调查。

Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey.

作者信息

Alqahtani Jaber S, Mendes Renata G, Aldhahir Abdulelah, Rowley Daniel, AlAhmari Mohammed D, Ntoumenopoulos George, Alghamdi Saeed M, Sreedharan Jithin K, Aldabayan Yousef S, Oyelade Tope, Alrajeh Ahmed, Olivieri Carlo, AlQuaimi Maher, Sullivan Jerome, Almeshari Mohammed A, Esquinas Antonio

机构信息

UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 18;13:1635-1648. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S279031. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, it is important to understand how frontline clinicians manage ventilatory support and the various limiting factors.

METHODS

An online survey composed of 32 questions was developed and validated by an international expert panel.

RESULTS

Overall, 502 respondents from 40 countries across six continents completed the survey. The mean number (±SD) of ICU beds was 64 ± 84. The most popular initial diagnostic tools used for treatment initiation were arterial blood gas (48%) and clinical presentation (37.5%), while the national COVID-19 guidelines were the most used (61.2%). High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (53.8%), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (47%), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (92%) were mostly used for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 cases, respectively. However, only 38.8%, 56.6% and 82.9% of the respondents had standard protocols for HFNC, NIV, and IMV, respectively. The most frequently used modes of IMV and NIV were volume control (VC) (36.1%) and continuous positive airway pressure/pressure support (CPAP/PS) (40.6%). About 54% of the respondents did not adhere to the recommended, regular ventilator check interval. The majority of the respondents (85.7%) used proning with IMV, with 48.4% using it for 12-16 hours, and 46.2% had tried awake proning in combination with HFNC or NIV. Increased staff workload (45.02%), lack of trained staff (44.22%) and shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) (42.63%) were the main barriers to COVID-19 management.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that general clinical practices involving ventilatory support were highly heterogeneous, with limited use of standard protocols and most frontline clinicians depending on isolated and varied management guidelines. We found increased staff workload, lack of trained staff and shortage of PPE to be the main limiting factors affecting global COVID-19 ventilatory support management.

摘要

背景

随着新冠疫情在全球范围内持续肆虐,了解一线临床医生如何进行通气支持以及各种限制因素至关重要。

方法

由一个国际专家小组制定并验证了一份包含32个问题的在线调查问卷。

结果

总体而言,来自六大洲40个国家的502名受访者完成了调查。重症监护病房床位的平均数量(±标准差)为64±84。用于开始治疗的最常用初始诊断工具是动脉血气分析(48%)和临床表现(37.5%),而国家新冠疫情指南是使用最多的(61.2%)。高流量鼻导管吸氧(HFNC)(53.8%)、无创通气(NIV)(47%)和有创机械通气(IMV)(92%)分别主要用于轻症、中症和重症新冠病例。然而,分别只有38.8%、56.6%和82.9%的受访者有HFNC、NIV和IMV的标准操作流程。IMV和NIV最常用的模式分别是容量控制(VC)(36.1%)和持续气道正压通气/压力支持(CPAP/PS)(40.6%)。约54%的受访者未遵守推荐的定期呼吸机检查间隔。大多数受访者(85.7%)在进行IMV时采用俯卧位通气,其中48.4%使用12 - 16小时,46.2%尝试过清醒俯卧位通气并结合HFNC或NIV。工作人员工作量增加(45.02%)、缺乏训练有素的工作人员(44.22%)和个人防护装备(PPE)短缺(42.63%)是新冠疫情管理的主要障碍。

结论

我们的结果表明,涉及通气支持的一般临床实践差异很大,标准操作流程的使用有限,大多数一线临床医生依赖零散且多样的管理指南。我们发现工作人员工作量增加、缺乏训练有素的工作人员和PPE短缺是影响全球新冠疫情通气支持管理的主要限制因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f424/7680685/b2010b8777db/JMDH-13-1635-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验