Kher Udatta, Tunkiwala Ali, Patil Pravinkumar G
Private practice, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla can be difficult because of anatomic limitations and high esthetic demand. The choice between cement and screw retention depends on factors such as esthetics, occlusion, retrievability, and passivity. The choice is also often governed by the ability to manage technical or biologic complications. In the edentulous maxilla, because of the bone trajectory and resorption pattern, unfavorable implant angulations may be encountered. In such situations, a conventional screw-retained prosthesis is difficult to design. This article describes the restoration of edentulous maxillae for a series of patients with different complete-arch fixed prosthesis designs. The clinical guidelines, including indications, advantages, and limitations of each design, were discussed.
由于解剖学限制和较高的美学要求,在上颌无牙颌中植入支持的固定修复体可能具有挑战性。粘结固位和螺丝固位之间的选择取决于美学、咬合、可取出性和被动就位等因素。这种选择通常还取决于处理技术或生物学并发症的能力。在上颌无牙颌中,由于骨轨迹和吸收模式,可能会遇到不利的种植体角度。在这种情况下,传统的螺丝固位修复体很难设计。本文描述了一系列采用不同全牙弓固定修复体设计的上颌无牙颌患者的修复情况。讨论了每种设计的临床指南,包括适应证、优点和局限性。