Clinical Pharmacy Department, Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Emergency Department, Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e040473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040473.
This study aimed to characterise the prescribing patterns and evaluate the appropriateness of the prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in adult patients via a review of electronic medical records in a single-centred hospital.
All patients admitted to the outpatient department of Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were evaluated. Individuals aged 18 years or above and with at least one dispensing for PPIs were identified as PPI users. New PPI users were defined as a subject who did not receive any dispensing for PPIs in the year prior to the index date. Baseline characteristics of PPI users and their therapies were described by treatment indication, economic indicators and co-prescription, overall and separately.
The prescription database was retrieved from the hospital information system of Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Among 18 435 identified PPI users in 2018, 14 219 patients (aged 18 years or above) who had at least one dispensing PPIs were new users (77%), and among them, men accounted for 47%. The mean treatment duration was 23 days. Omeprazole was the most commonly prescribed drug. PPIs are inappropriately prescribed in 50% (13 589/25 850) of prescriptions. Prescription appropriateness analysis indicated that the unapproved indications for PPI new users accounted for 47%; among them, the proportion of gastritis diagnosis was 34%. The proportion of PPI new users with co-prescription of glucocorticosteroids (GCs) who have risk factors accounted for 24% and lower than other co-prescription. A majority of PPI users (73%) reported high-dose PPI prescription. The defined daily dose of oral pantoprazole was the highest, and injectable omeprazole had the highest defined daily cost. In contrast, only the drug utilisation index value of oral esomeprazole was less than 1.0.
The results indicate the challenge of PPI use was accompanied by unapproved indications, frequent inappropriate co-prescription with GCs and excessive dosages. Efforts should be paid to promote rational use and ensure the choice of suitable PPI therapy in the future.
本研究旨在通过回顾复旦大学附属金山医院单一中心医院的电子病历,描述质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的处方模式,并评估其使用的适宜性。
评估 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间在复旦大学附属金山医院门诊就诊的所有患者。年龄在 18 岁及以上且至少有一次 PPI 配药的患者被认定为 PPI 用户。新 PPI 用户定义为在索引日期前一年未接受任何 PPI 配药的患者。描述 PPI 用户及其治疗方案的基线特征,包括治疗指征、经济指标和联合用药情况。
从复旦大学附属金山医院的医院信息系统中检索处方数据库。
在 2018 年确定的 18435 名 PPI 用户中,有 14219 名(年龄在 18 岁及以上)至少有一次 PPI 配药的患者为新用户(77%),其中男性占 47%。平均治疗时间为 23 天。奥美拉唑是最常用的药物。50%(13589/25850)的处方存在不适当的 PPI 用药。处方适宜性分析表明,新 PPI 用户中无适应证用药占 47%;其中,胃炎诊断的比例为 34%。有 GC 联合用药风险因素的新 PPI 用户占 PPI 新用户的 24%,低于其他联合用药。大多数 PPI 用户(73%)报告使用高剂量 PPI 处方。口服泮托拉唑的日限定剂量最高,注射用奥美拉唑的日限定费用最高。相反,只有口服埃索美拉唑的药物利用指数值小于 1.0。
结果表明,PPI 使用面临无适应证、频繁不合理与 GC 联合用药以及剂量过大等挑战。未来应努力促进合理用药,并确保选择合适的 PPI 治疗方案。