Ding Yihan, Sun Chenyu, Zhou Qin, Cheng Ce, Yan Cunye, Wang Benzhong
Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 28;26:e927553. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927553.
BACKGROUND Breast diseases pose increasing threat to women health as peoples lifestyle changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical application value of Palpation Imaging (PI) in the diagnosis of breast diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS From October 2019 to February 2020, 184 patients with 225 breast lesions were examined by using PI, ultrasound, and mammography in the department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. All cases were confirmed pathologically by core-needle biopsy or excisional biopsy. The cut-off value of the PI tests was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We compared the examination results of PI with ultrasound and mammography to analyze the diagnostic value of PI. RESULTS Pathological examination revealed that 186/225(82.67%) lesions were benign, while 39 were malignant. All 8 parameters of PI were significantly correlated with pathological findings (P<0.05). The best cut-off value for the PI score was 19.5 and the area under the curve (AUC) for the PI was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.874-0.968, P<0.001) with 89.7% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity. PI showed greater sensitivity (89.7%) and its specificity (86.0% vs. 86.4%, P=0.931) and accuracy (86.7% vs. 84.6%, P=0.604) were similar to those of mammography. The combination of 3 types of test is superior to a single examination. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 98.8%. CONCLUSIONS PI has high clinical value in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Combination examination has the potential to improve the detection of breast cancer in screening and diagnostic capacities and can be used as a supplement to ultrasound and mammography.
背景 随着人们生活方式的改变,乳腺疾病对女性健康构成的威胁日益增加。本研究旨在探讨触诊成像(PI)在乳腺疾病诊断中的临床应用价值。
材料与方法 2019年10月至2020年2月,安徽医科大学第一附属医院乳腺外科对184例患有225个乳腺病变的患者进行了PI、超声和乳腺X线摄影检查。所有病例均经粗针活检或切除活检病理确诊。PI检查的临界值通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线确定。我们将PI的检查结果与超声和乳腺X线摄影进行比较,以分析PI的诊断价值。
结果 病理检查显示,225个病变中186个(82.67%)为良性,39个为恶性。PI的所有8个参数均与病理结果显著相关(P<0.05)。PI评分的最佳临界值为19.5,PI的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.921(95%CI:0.874-0.968,P<0.001),敏感性为89.7%,特异性为86.0%。PI显示出更高的敏感性(89.7%),其特异性(86.0%对86.4%,P=0.931)和准确性(86.7%对84.6%,P=0.604)与乳腺X线摄影相似。三种检查方法联合优于单一检查。敏感性为100%,特异性为98.8%。
结论 PI在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变方面具有较高的临床价值。联合检查有可能提高乳腺癌筛查和诊断的检出能力,可作为超声和乳腺X线摄影的补充。