Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah.
Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Denver.
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Mar;68(2):149-155. doi: 10.1037/cou0000491. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Efforts to help therapists improve their multicultural competence (MCC) rely on measures that can distinguish between different levels of competence. MCC is often assessed by asking clients to rate their experiences with their therapists. However, differences in client ratings of therapist MCC do not necessarily provide information about the relative performance of therapists and can be influenced by other factors including the client's own characteristics. In this study, we used a repeated measures design of 8,497 observations from 1,458 clients across 35 therapists to clarify the proportion of variability in MCC ratings attributed to the therapist versus the client and better understand the extent that an MCC measure detects therapist differences. Overall, we found that a small amount of variability in MCC ratings was attributed to the therapist (2%) and substantial amount attributed to the client (70%). These findings suggest that our measure of MCC primarily detected differences at the client level versus therapist level, indicating that therapist MCC scores were largely dependent on the client. Clinical implications and recommendations for future MCC research and measurement are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
努力帮助治疗师提高他们的多元文化能力 (MCC) 依赖于能够区分不同能力水平的措施。MCC 通常通过让客户评估他们与治疗师的经历来评估。然而,客户对治疗师 MCC 的评分差异不一定提供有关治疗师相对表现的信息,并且可能受到其他因素的影响,包括客户自身的特点。在这项研究中,我们使用了 35 名治疗师的 1458 名客户的 8497 次重复测量设计,以澄清 MCC 评分中归因于治疗师与客户的可变性比例,并更好地了解 MCC 测量检测治疗师差异的程度。总的来说,我们发现 MCC 评分的可变性很小一部分归因于治疗师(2%),很大一部分归因于客户(70%)。这些发现表明,我们的 MCC 测量主要在客户层面而非治疗师层面检测到差异,表明治疗师的 MCC 分数在很大程度上取决于客户。讨论了对未来 MCC 研究和测量的临床意义和建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。