Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Irish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Med Educ. 2021 Jun;55(6):678-688. doi: 10.1111/medu.14427. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
Gender bias has been observed in the authorship and editorship of academic literature in varied medical specialties. This is important as peer-reviewed publications, and participation on editorial boards, are closely related to academic productivity and advancement. The aim of this paper was to examine whether gender-based disparities in authorship and editorship exist in leading medical education journals.
A retrospective bibliometric review was conducted of articles published at eight different time-points across a 49-year time period (specifically: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2019) in four leading medical education journals (Academic Medicine, BMC Medical Education, Medical Education and Medical Teacher). First and last (as a proxy for senior) author gender was determined for each article, along with the gender of the 2019 editorial board members of each journal. Chi-square tests for trend were conducted to examine variations in author gender distributions over time, and binomial tests of proportions were conducted to examine gender distributions in authorship and editorship in 2019. Logistic regression analyses were carried out to determine factors that predicted the odds of authorship by women.
A total of 5749 articles were included. A significant trend of increased women as first and last authors was observed across all journals. The percentage of women first authors increased from 6.6% in 1970 to 53.7% in 2019 (P < .001), and women last authors increased from 9.5% in 1970 to 46% in 2019 (P < .001). Overall, the distributions of women first authors, last authors and editorial board members in 2019 indicated greater gender parity than many other fields of medicine.
Positive progress towards gender parity has been made in medical education scholarship. However, future research and efforts are needed to ensure the continued participation, and highlighting, of women in medical education scholarship and to address other factors which may hinder academic advancement for women in this field.
在不同的医学专业领域的学术文献的作者和编辑中都存在性别偏见。这一点很重要,因为同行评议的出版物和编辑委员会的参与与学术生产力和进步密切相关。本文的目的是研究在领先的医学教育期刊中是否存在基于性别的作者和编辑差异。
对在四个领先的医学教育期刊(《学术医学》、《BMC 医学教育》、《医学教育》和《医学教师》)中发表的文章进行了回顾性的文献计量学审查,时间跨度为 49 年,共分为八个不同的时间点(分别为:1970 年、1980 年、1990 年、2000 年、2005 年、2010 年、2015 年和 2019 年)。确定了每篇文章的第一作者和最后作者(作为高级作者的代理)的性别,以及每个期刊 2019 年编辑委员会成员的性别。进行了卡方趋势检验,以检验作者性别分布随时间的变化情况,并进行了二项式检验,以检验 2019 年作者和编辑中的性别分布。进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定预测女性作者可能性的因素。
共纳入了 5749 篇文章。在所有期刊中,第一作者和最后作者的女性比例都呈现出显著增加的趋势。女性第一作者的比例从 1970 年的 6.6%增加到 2019 年的 53.7%(P<.001),女性最后作者的比例从 1970 年的 9.5%增加到 2019 年的 46%(P<.001)。总的来说,2019 年女性第一作者、最后作者和编辑委员会成员的分布表明,医学教育领域的性别均等程度高于许多其他医学领域。
在医学教育学术领域,朝着性别均等的方向取得了积极的进展。然而,未来还需要进一步的研究和努力,以确保女性继续参与医学教育学术,并解决该领域中可能阻碍女性学术进步的其他因素。