Suppr超能文献

数字健康的发展与弊端:双相情感障碍顶级热门应用的综述与分析

Digital health developments and drawbacks: a review and analysis of top-returned apps for bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Lagan Sarah, Ramakrishnan Abinaya, Lamont Evan, Ramakrishnan Aparna, Frye Mark, Torous John

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 75 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA, 02446, USA.

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020 Dec 1;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00202-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a growing body of literature highlights the potential benefit of smartphone-based mobile apps to aid in self-management and treatment of bipolar disorder, it is unclear whether such evidence-based apps are readily available and accessible to a user of the app store.

RESULTS

Using our systematic framework for the evaluation of mental health apps, we analyzed the accessibility, privacy, clinical foundation, features, and interoperability of the top-returned 100 apps for bipolar disorder. Only 56% of the apps mentioned bipolar disorder specifically in their title, description, or content. Only one app's efficacy was supported in a peer-reviewed study, and 32 apps lacked privacy policies. The most common features provided were mood tracking, journaling, and psychoeducation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis reveals substantial limitations in the current digital environment for individuals seeking an evidence-based, clinically usable app for bipolar disorder. Although there have been academic advances in development of digital interventions for bipolar disorder, this work has yet to be translated to the publicly available app marketplace. This unmet need of digital mood management underscores the need for a comprehensive evaluation system of mental health apps, which we have endeavored to provide through our framework and accompanying database (apps.digitalpsych.org).

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的文献强调基于智能手机的移动应用程序在双相情感障碍自我管理和治疗方面的潜在益处,但尚不清楚应用商店的用户是否能轻易获取此类循证应用程序。

结果

使用我们评估心理健康应用程序的系统框架,我们分析了双相情感障碍排名前100的应用程序的可访问性、隐私性、临床基础、功能和互操作性。只有56%的应用程序在其标题、描述或内容中特别提及双相情感障碍。在一项同行评审研究中,只有一款应用程序的疗效得到支持,32款应用程序缺乏隐私政策。提供的最常见功能是情绪跟踪、日记记录和心理教育。

结论

我们的分析揭示了当前数字环境对于寻求循证、临床可用的双相情感障碍应用程序的个人存在重大局限性。尽管双相情感障碍数字干预的开发在学术上取得了进展,但这项工作尚未转化为公开可用的应用程序市场。这种数字情绪管理需求未得到满足的情况凸显了对心理健康应用程序进行全面评估系统的需求,我们已努力通过我们的框架和配套数据库(apps.digitalpsych.org)来提供这一系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9895/7708606/17ed36f36caa/40345_2020_202_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验