Section 1, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2020 Nov 27;54(2):e9542. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20209542. eCollection 2020.
Influenza viruses exacerbate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with considerable morbidity and mortality. Zanamivir and oseltamivir are effective in treating influenza. However, their efficacy in relieving influenza symptoms in COPD patients remains unknown, with the lack of controlled trials in this subject. Therefore, we conducted this randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of both interventions in this population. Patients were allocated to two groups (80 patients each): oseltamivir (OSELTA) and zanamivir (ZANA) groups. Oseltamivir (75 mg) was orally administered twice daily for 5 days, while zanamivir (10 mg) was inhaled twice daily for 5 days. Clinical parameters including body temperature, influenza symptoms (i.e., sore throat, cough, etc.), and serial blood tests were recorded on days 1, 3, and 7. We analyzed primary (changes in body temperature) and secondary outcomes (changes in non-specific symptoms) using the pre-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. Differences between groups were assessed using t-test. Oseltamivir and zanamivir significantly reduced body temperature on the 3rd day after treatment; however, the number of patients who reported clinical improvement in influenza-like symptoms was significantly higher in the OSELTA group compared to the ZANA group on days 3 (85 vs 68.8%, P=0.015) and 7 (97.5 vs 83.8%, P=0.003). However, no significant changes in hematological (white blood cells and its subtypes) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) parameters were noted (P>0.05). Our results suggested that oseltamivir and zanamivir are effective in reducing body temperature, while oseltamivir led to better clinical improvement regarding influenza-like symptoms in patients with COPD.
流感病毒可使慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)恶化,导致相当高的发病率和死亡率。扎那米韦和奥司他韦可有效治疗流感。然而,在 COPD 患者中,其缓解流感症状的疗效尚不清楚,这方面缺乏对照试验。因此,我们开展了这项随机对照试验,以研究这两种干预措施在该人群中的临床疗效。患者被分为两组(每组 80 例):奥司他韦(OSELTA)组和扎那米韦(ZANA)组。奥司他韦(75mg)口服,每日 2 次,连用 5 天;扎那米韦(10mg)吸入,每日 2 次,连用 5 天。在第 1、3 和 7 天记录临床参数,包括体温、流感症状(如咽痛、咳嗽等)和连续血液检查。我们使用预方案和意向治疗分析来分析主要(体温变化)和次要(非特异性症状变化)结局。采用 t 检验比较组间差异。奥司他韦和扎那米韦在治疗后第 3 天均显著降低体温;然而,在第 3 天(85%比 68.8%,P=0.015)和第 7 天(97.5%比 83.8%,P=0.003),报告流感样症状临床改善的患者数量在 OSELTA 组显著高于 ZANA 组。然而,血液学(白细胞及其亚型)和炎症(C 反应蛋白)参数无显著变化(P>0.05)。我们的结果表明,奥司他韦和扎那米韦均能有效降低体温,而奥司他韦可使 COPD 患者的流感样症状得到更好的临床改善。