Cuesta-Frau David, Miró-Martínez Pau, Oltra-Crespo Sandra, Jordán-Núñez Jorge, Vargas Borja, González Paula, Varela-Entrecanales Manuel
Technological Institute of Informatics, Universitat Politècnica de València, 03801 Alcoi Campus, Spain.
Department of Statistics, Universitat Politècnica de València, 03801 Alcoi Campus, Spain.
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Nov 6;20(11):853. doi: 10.3390/e20110853.
Many entropy-related methods for signal classification have been proposed and exploited successfully in the last several decades. However, it is sometimes difficult to find the optimal measure and the optimal parameter configuration for a specific purpose or context. Suboptimal settings may therefore produce subpar results and not even reach the desired level of significance. In order to increase the signal classification accuracy in these suboptimal situations, this paper proposes statistical models created with uncorrelated measures that exploit the possible synergies between them. The methods employed are permutation entropy (PE), approximate entropy (ApEn), and sample entropy (SampEn). Since PE is based on subpattern ordinal differences, whereas ApEn and SampEn are based on subpattern amplitude differences, we hypothesized that a combination of PE with another method would enhance the individual performance of any of them. The dataset was composed of body temperature records, for which we did not obtain a classification accuracy above 80% with a single measure, in this study or even in previous studies. The results confirmed that the classification accuracy rose up to 90% when combining PE and ApEn with a logistic model.
在过去几十年中,已经提出并成功应用了许多与熵相关的信号分类方法。然而,有时很难为特定目的或背景找到最佳度量和最佳参数配置。因此,次优设置可能会产生低于标准的结果,甚至无法达到预期的显著水平。为了在这些次优情况下提高信号分类准确率,本文提出了使用不相关度量创建的统计模型,该模型利用了它们之间可能的协同作用。所采用的方法是排列熵(PE)、近似熵(ApEn)和样本熵(SampEn)。由于PE基于子模式的顺序差异,而ApEn和SampEn基于子模式的幅度差异,我们假设将PE与另一种方法相结合将提高它们中任何一种方法的个体性能。数据集由体温记录组成,在本研究甚至以前的研究中,我们使用单一度量时都没有获得超过80%的分类准确率。结果证实,将PE和ApEn与逻辑模型相结合时,分类准确率提高到了90%