Lepri Andrea Cozzi, Villano Marco, Matassi Fabrizio, Carulli Christian, Innocenti Massimo, Civinini Roberto
Department of Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Unit, University of Florence, Italy.
Hip Int. 2020 Dec;30(2_suppl):13-19. doi: 10.1177/1120700020966800.
The Watson-Jones interval plane between tensor fascia lata (TFL) and the gluteus medius (GM) has come back into fashion in the past few years - Röttinger described the anterolateral minimal invasive approach (ALMI) for use in total hip replacement, in which the standard Watson-Jones interval was used, but with a completely intermuscular plane. However, the term anterolateral is often still utilised to describe intramuscular approaches in which the GM was violated, thus creating a potential misunderstanding in the literature. Accordingly, we have designed a study to answer the following questions: (1) are there articles in the recent literature that use the term "anterolateral" to describe different approaches; (2) which would be the correct description of the anterolateral approach?
We did a systematic review of the literature based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, to look for peer reviewed papers of any evidence level focusing on the definition of anterolateral approach; MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched.
73 manuscripts met the criteria of the systematic search. 53 papers (72.6%) reported the term anterolateral approach to describe a complete intermuscular approach between the interval between GM and TFL. Nonetheless, in the remaining 20 papers (27.4%) the term anterolateral was used to describe intramuscular approaches in which the gluteus medius was violated.
In about 1 out of 4 papers in the recent literature, the term anterolateral was utilised to describe approaches that are completely different both in terms of anatomy and function.
在过去几年中,阔筋膜张肌(TFL)和臀中肌(GM)之间的沃森 - 琼斯间隙平面再次流行起来——罗廷格描述了用于全髋关节置换的前外侧微创入路(ALMI),其中使用了标准的沃森 - 琼斯间隙,但采用了完全肌间隙平面。然而,“前外侧”一词仍经常被用于描述侵犯臀中肌的肌内入路,从而在文献中造成潜在的误解。因此,我们设计了一项研究来回答以下问题:(1)近期文献中是否有文章使用“前外侧”一词来描述不同的入路;(2)前外侧入路的正确描述是什么?
我们根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南对文献进行了系统评价,以寻找任何证据水平的、关注前外侧入路定义的同行评审论文;检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE。
73篇手稿符合系统检索的标准。53篇论文(72.6%)报告使用“前外侧入路”一词来描述GM和TFL之间间隙的完全肌间隙入路。然而,在其余20篇论文(27.4%)中,“前外侧”一词被用于描述侵犯臀中肌的肌内入路。
在近期文献中,约四分之一的论文使用“前外侧”一词来描述在解剖结构和功能方面完全不同的入路。