Dinu Anca Raluca, Rogobete Alexandru Florin, Popovici Sonia Elena, Bedreag Ovidiu Horea, Papurica Marius, Dumbuleu Corina Maria, Velovan Raluca Ramona, Toma Daiana, Georgescu Corina Maria, Trache Lavinia Ioana, Barsac Claudiu, Luca Loredana, Buzzi Bettina, Maghiar Andra, Sandesc Mihai Alexandru, Rimawi Samir, Vaduva Madalin Marian, Bratu Lavinia Melania, Luminosu Paul Manuel, Sandesc Dorel
Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Clinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Emergency County Hospital "Pius Brinzeu", Timisoara 325100, Romania.
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;22(3):356. doi: 10.3390/e22030356.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed interventions in general surgery departments. Some of the most important aims in achieving perioperative stability in these patients is diminishing the impact of general anesthesia on the hemodynamic stability and the optimization of anesthetic drug doses based on the individual clinical profile of each patient. The objective of this study is the evaluation of the impact, as monitored through entropy (both state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE)), that the depth of anesthesia has on the hemodynamic stability, as well as the doses of volatile anesthetic. A prospective, observational, randomized, and monocentric study was carried out between January and December 2019 in the Clinic of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of the "Pius Brînzeu" Emergency County Hospital in Timișoara, Romania. The patients included in the study were divided in two study groups: patients in Group A (target group) received multimodal monitoring, which included monitoring of standard parameters and of entropy (SE and RE); while the patients in Group B (control group) only received standard monitoring. The anesthetic dose in group A was optimized to achieve a target entropy of 40-60. A total of 68 patients met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to one of the two study groups: group A (N = 43) or group B (N = 25). There were no statistically significant differences identified between the two groups for both demographical and clinical characteristics (p > 0.05). Statistically significant differences were identified for the number of hypotensive episodes (p = 0.011, 95% CI: [0.1851, 0.7042]) and for the number of episodes of bradycardia (p < 0.0001, 95% CI: [0.3296, 0.7923]). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the Sevoflurane consumption between the two study groups (p = 0.0498, 95% CI: [-0.3942, 0.9047]). The implementation of the multimodal monitoring protocol, including the standard parameters and the measurement of entropy for determining the depth of anesthesia (SE and RE) led to a considerable improvement in perioperative hemodynamic stability. Furthermore, optimizing the doses of anesthetic drugs based on the individual clinical profile of each patient led to a considerable decrease in drug consumption, as well as to a lower incidence of hemodynamic side-effects.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术是普通外科最常开展的手术之一。实现这些患者围手术期稳定的一些最重要目标是减少全身麻醉对血流动力学稳定性的影响,并根据每位患者的个体临床情况优化麻醉药物剂量。本研究的目的是评估通过熵(状态熵(SE)和反应熵(RE))监测的麻醉深度对血流动力学稳定性以及挥发性麻醉剂剂量的影响。2019年1月至12月,在罗马尼亚蒂米什瓦拉的“皮乌斯·布林泽乌”蒂米什县急救医院麻醉与重症监护科进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、随机、单中心研究。纳入研究的患者分为两个研究组:A组(目标组)患者接受多模式监测,包括标准参数和熵(SE和RE)监测;而B组(对照组)患者仅接受标准监测。A组的麻醉剂量进行了优化,以达到40 - 60的目标熵。共有68例患者符合纳入标准,并被分配到两个研究组之一:A组(N = 43)或B组(N = 25)。两组在人口统计学和临床特征方面均未发现统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。在低血压发作次数(p = 0.011,95% CI:[0.1851, 0.7042])和心动过缓发作次数方面发现了统计学显著差异(p < 0.0001,95% CI:[0.3296, 0.7923])。此外,两个研究组之间七氟烷消耗量存在显著差异(p = 0.0498,95% CI:[-0.3942, 0.9047])。实施包括标准参数和用于确定麻醉深度的熵测量(SE和RE)的多模式监测方案,可使围手术期血流动力学稳定性得到显著改善。此外,根据每位患者的个体临床情况优化麻醉药物剂量,可使药物消耗量显著降低,并降低血流动力学副作用的发生率。