Backes Indra K, González-Garcı A Lola, Holtsch Anne, Müller Frank, Jacobs Karin, Kraus Tobias
INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Campus D2 2, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Experimental Physics and Center for Biophysics, Campus E2 9, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
J Phys Chem Lett. 2020 Dec 17;11(24):10538-10547. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02831. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Hybrid electronic materials combine inorganic metals and semiconductors with π-conjugated polymers. The orientation of the polymer molecules in relation to the inorganic components is crucial for electrical material properties and device performance, but little is known of the configuration of π-conjugated polymers that bind to inorganic surfaces. Highly curved surfaces are common when using nanoscale components, for example, metal nanocrystal cores covered with conductive polymers. It is important to understand their effect on molecular arrangement. Here, we compare the molecular structures and electrical conductivities of well-defined nanoscale gold spheres and rods with shells of the covalently bound polythiophene PTEBS (poly[2-(3-thienyl)-ethyloxy-4-butylsulfonate]). We prepared aqueous sinter-free inks from the particles and printed them. The particles formed highly conductive films immediately after drying. Films with spherical metal cores consistently had 40% lower conductivities than films based on nanorods. Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed differences in the gold-sulfur bonds of PTEBS on rods and spheres. The fractions of bond sulfur groups implied differences in the alignment of PTEBS with the surface. More polymer molecules were bound in an edge-on configuration on spheres than on rods, where almost all polymers aligned "face-on" with the metal surface. This leads to different interface resistances: gold-polythiophene-gold interfaces between rods with π-π-tacked face-on PTEBS apparently foster electron transport along the surface-normal direction, while edge-on PTEBS does not. Molecular confinement thus increases the conductivity of hybrid inks based on highly curved nanostructures.
混合电子材料将无机金属和半导体与π共轭聚合物结合在一起。聚合物分子相对于无机成分的取向对于电气材料性能和器件性能至关重要,但对于与无机表面结合的π共轭聚合物的构型却知之甚少。使用纳米级组件时,高曲率表面很常见,例如,覆盖有导电聚合物的金属纳米晶核。了解它们对分子排列的影响很重要。在这里,我们比较了具有共价结合的聚噻吩PTEBS(聚[2-(3-噻吩基)-乙氧基-4-丁基磺酸盐])壳层的明确定义的纳米级金球和金棒的分子结构和电导率。我们从这些颗粒制备了无烧结水性油墨并进行印刷。颗粒干燥后立即形成高导电薄膜。具有球形金属核的薄膜的电导率始终比基于纳米棒的薄膜低40%。拉曼光谱和X射线光电子能谱揭示了棒状和球状PTEBS的金-硫键的差异。键合硫基团的比例暗示了PTEBS与表面排列的差异。与棒状相比,更多的聚合物分子以边对边构型结合在球状上,在棒状上几乎所有聚合物都与金属表面“面对面”排列。这导致了不同的界面电阻:具有面对面π-π堆积的PTEBS的棒状之间的金-聚噻吩-金界面显然促进了电子沿表面法线方向的传输,而边对边排列的PTEBS则不然。因此,分子限制提高了基于高曲率纳米结构的混合油墨的电导率。