Sundaralingam Anand, Banka Radhika, Rahman Najib M
Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):59-74. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00140-7. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
Pleural infection is a millennia-spanning condition that has proved challenging to treat over many years. Fourteen percent of cases of pneumonia are reported to present with a pleural effusion on chest X-ray (CXR), which rises to 44% on ultrasound but many will resolve with prompt antibiotic therapy. To guide treatment, parapneumonic effusions have been separated into distinct categories according to their biochemical, microbiological and radiological characteristics. There is wide variation in causative organisms according to geographical location and healthcare setting. Positive cultures are only obtained in 56% of cases; therefore, empirical antibiotics should provide Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic cover whilst providing adequate pleural penetrance. With the advent of next-generation sequencing techniques, yields are expected to improve. Complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema necessitate prompt tube thoracostomy. It is reported that 16-27% treated in this way will fail on this therapy and require some form of escalation. The now seminal Multi-centre Intrapleural Sepsis Trials (MIST) demonstrated the use of combination fibrinolysin and DNase as more effective in the treatment of empyema compared to either agent alone or placebo, and success rates of 90% are reported with this technique. The focus is now on dose adjustments according to the patient's specific 'fibrinolytic potential', in order to deliver personalised therapy. Surgery has remained a cornerstone in the management of pleural infection and is certainly required in late-stage manifestations of the disease. However, its role in early-stage disease and optimal patient selection is being re-explored. A number of adjunct and exploratory therapies are also discussed in this review, including the use of local anaesthetic thoracoscopy, indwelling pleural catheters, intrapleural antibiotics, pleural irrigation and steroid therapy.
胸膜感染是一种跨越千年的病症,多年来一直难以治疗。据报道,14%的肺炎病例在胸部X光(CXR)检查时出现胸腔积液,而超声检查时这一比例升至44%,但许多病例通过及时的抗生素治疗可自行缓解。为指导治疗,根据其生化、微生物学和放射学特征,将肺炎旁胸腔积液分为不同类别。根据地理位置和医疗环境的不同,致病微生物存在很大差异。仅56%的病例培养结果呈阳性;因此,经验性抗生素应覆盖革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和厌氧菌,同时要有足够的胸膜穿透性。随着下一代测序技术的出现,阳性率有望提高。复杂性肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸需要及时进行胸腔闭式引流术。据报道,以这种方式治疗的病例中有16 - 27%会治疗失败,需要某种形式的升级治疗。具有开创性的多中心胸膜内脓毒症试验(MIST)表明,与单独使用纤溶酶或脱氧核糖核酸酶(DNase)或安慰剂相比,联合使用纤溶酶和DNase治疗脓胸更有效,据报道该技术的成功率为90%。现在的重点是根据患者的特定“纤溶潜力”进行剂量调整,以提供个性化治疗。手术一直是胸膜感染治疗的基石,在疾病的晚期表现中肯定是必要的。然而,其在早期疾病中的作用以及最佳患者选择正在重新探讨。本综述还讨论了一些辅助和探索性治疗方法,包括使用局部麻醉胸腔镜检查、留置胸膜导管、胸膜内抗生素、胸膜冲洗和类固醇治疗。