Grgic Jozo, Venier Sandro, Schoenfeld Brad J, Mikulic Pavle
Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Aug 31;74:177-183. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2020-0023. eCollection 2020 Aug.
We aimed to examine the effects of placebo and caffeine compared to a control condition on mean velocity in the bench press exercise. Twenty-five resistance-trained men participated in this randomized, crossover, double-blind study. The participants performed the bench press with loads of 50%, 75%, and 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), after no supplementation (i.e., control), and after ingesting caffeine (6 mg/kg), and placebo (6 mg/kg of dextrose). At 50% 1RM, there was a significant effect of caffeine on mean velocity compared to control (effect size [ES] = 0.29; p = 0.003), but not when compared to placebo (ES = 0.09; p = 0.478). At 75% 1RM, there was a significant effect of caffeine on mean velocity compared to placebo (ES = 0.34; p = 0.001), and compared to control (ES = 0.32; p < 0.001). At 90% 1RM, there was a significant effect of caffeine on mean velocity compared to placebo (ES = 0.36; p < 0.001), and compared to control (ES = 0.46; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between placebo and control in any of the analyzed outcomes. When evaluated pre-exercise and post-exercise, 20% to 44% and 28% to 52% of all participants identified caffeine and placebo trials beyond random chance, respectively. Given that the blinding of the participants was generally effective, and that there were no significant ergogenic effects of placebo ingestion, the improvements in performance following caffeine ingestion can be mainly attributed to caffeine's physiological mechanisms of action.
我们旨在研究与对照条件相比,安慰剂和咖啡因对卧推运动平均速度的影响。25名经过抗阻训练的男性参与了这项随机、交叉、双盲研究。参与者在未补充任何物质(即对照)、摄入咖啡因(6毫克/千克)和安慰剂(6毫克/千克葡萄糖)后,分别以一次重复最大值(1RM)的50%、75%和90%的负荷进行卧推。在50% 1RM时,与对照相比,咖啡因对平均速度有显著影响(效应量[ES]=0.29;p=0.003),但与安慰剂相比则无显著影响(ES=0.09;p=0.478)。在75% 1RM时,与安慰剂相比,咖啡因对平均速度有显著影响(ES=0.34;p=0.001),与对照相比也有显著影响(ES=0.32;p<0.001)。在90% 1RM时,与安慰剂相比,咖啡因对平均速度有显著影响(ES=0.36;p<0.001),与对照相比同样有显著影响(ES=0.46;p<0.001)。在任何分析结果中,安慰剂和对照之间均无显著差异。在运动前和运动后进行评估时,分别有20%至44%和28%至52%的所有参与者能够以高于随机概率的水平识别出咖啡因和安慰剂试验。鉴于参与者的盲法一般有效,且摄入安慰剂没有显著的促力效应,摄入咖啡因后运动表现的改善主要可归因于咖啡因的生理作用机制。