Suppr超能文献

CT 比 MRI 或数字 X 光摄影更能准确地检测出马蹄内的异物。

CT more accurately detects foreign bodies within the equine foot than MRI or digital radiography.

机构信息

Philip Leverhulme Equine Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.

出版信息

Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2021 Mar;62(2):225-235. doi: 10.1111/vru.12944. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

Identification and characterization of foreign bodies in the distal limb of horses poses a diagnostic challenge. The aims of this prospective experimental cadaver study were to describe the appearance of five foreign body materials within the equine hoof using CT, MRI, and digital radiography (DR) and to compare interrater agreement among three reviewers. Fifty foreign bodies consisting of five materials were implanted at a solar location or a coronary location in 25 equine cadaver feet. The images were reviewed by three equine veterinarians experienced in advanced imaging interpretation, who were blinded to the material of the foreign body. Foreign bodies were graded on visibility and appearance. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for accurate identification of the different materials. Interrater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. Computed tomography had higher visibility score, sensitivity/specificity, and interrater agreement for detection of all materials; particularly slate, glass, and dry wood, compared to the other imaging modalities. Soaked wood and plastic had lower sensitivity (31-33%) on CT with a similar attenuation of the two materials. Foreign bodies were often visible on MRI, although with similar appearance and unclear details. On DR, only slate and glass were visible. The interrater agreement for identifying the correct material was almost perfect for slate, glass, and dry wood (κ = 0.92-1.00) and poor for plastic and soaked wood (κ < 0.20) on CT. Interrater agreement was poor for all materials on MRI and DR (κ < 0.20), with the except for fair (κ = 0.28) for slate on DR and moderate (κ = 0.28) for soaked wood on MRI.

摘要

在马的肢体远端识别和描述异物具有一定的诊断挑战性。本前瞻性实验性尸体研究的目的是描述 CT、MRI 和数字射线照相术 (DR) 下五种异物材料在马蹄中的表现,并比较三位审阅者之间的组内一致性。50 个异物由五种材料组成,植入 25 个马尸体蹄的太阳位置或冠状位置。三位具有先进影像学解读经验的马兽医对图像进行了审阅,他们对异物的材料一无所知。异物根据可见性和外观进行分级。计算了不同材料的准确识别的敏感性和特异性。使用 Fleiss' kappa 评估组内一致性。与其他成像方式相比,CT 对所有材料(特别是板岩、玻璃和干木)的可视性评分、敏感性/特异性和组内一致性更高;尤其对于板岩、玻璃和干木。在 CT 上,浸泡木材和塑料的敏感性(31-33%)较低,两种材料的衰减相似。尽管异物的外观相似且细节不清晰,但 MRI 上经常可以看到异物。在 DR 上,只有板岩和玻璃可见。在 CT 上,识别正确材料的组内一致性对于板岩、玻璃和干木几乎是完美的(κ = 0.92-1.00),对于塑料和浸泡木材则很差(κ < 0.20)。对于 MRI 和 DR 上的所有材料,组内一致性都很差(κ < 0.20),但 DR 上的板岩为尚可(κ = 0.28),MRI 上的浸泡木材为中度(κ = 0.28)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验