Yu Jie, Xie Minyue, Ge Shengfang, Chai Peiwei, Zhou Yixiong, Ruan Jing
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 30;10:580029. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.580029. eCollection 2020.
Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with high heterogeneity. Several studies have been performed to identify cutaneous melanoma subtypes based on genomic profiling. However, few classifications based on assessments of immune-associated genes have limited clinical implications for cutaneous melanoma. Using 470 cutaneous melanoma samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we calculated the enrichment levels of 29 immune-associated gene sets in each sample and hierarchically clustered them into Immunity High (Immunity_H, n=323, 68.7%), Immunity Medium (Immunity_M, n=135, 28.7%), and Immunity Low (Immunity_L, n=12, 2.6%) based on the ssGSEA score. The ESTIMATE algorithm was used to calculate stromal scores (range: -1,800.51-1,901.99), immune scores (range: -1,476.28-3,780.33), estimate scores (range: -2,618.28-5,098.14) and tumor purity (range: 0.216-0.976) and they were significantly correlated with immune subtypes (Kruskal-Wallis test, < 0.001). The Immunity_H group tended to have higher expression levels of HLA and immune checkpoint genes (Kruskal-Wallis test, < 0.05). The Immunity_H group had the highest level of naïve B cells, resting dendritic cells, M1 macrophages, resting NK cells, plasma cells, CD4 memory activated T cells, CD8 T cells, follicular helper T cells and regulatory T cells, and the Immunity_L group had better overall survival. The GO terms identified in the Immunity_H group were mainly immune related. In conclusion, immune signature-associated cutaneous melanoma subtypes play a role in cutaneous melanoma prognosis stratification. The construction of immune signature-associated cutaneous melanoma subtypes predicted possible patient outcomes and provided possible immunotherapy candidates.
皮肤黑色素瘤是一种具有高度异质性的侵袭性恶性肿瘤。已经进行了多项研究以基于基因组分析来鉴定皮肤黑色素瘤亚型。然而,基于免疫相关基因评估的分类对皮肤黑色素瘤的临床意义有限。我们使用来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的470个皮肤黑色素瘤样本,计算了每个样本中29个免疫相关基因集的富集水平,并根据单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA)评分将它们分层聚类为高免疫组(Immunity_H,n = 323,68.7%)、中免疫组(Immunity_M,n = 135,28.7%)和低免疫组(Immunity_L, n = 12, 2.6%)。使用ESTIMATE算法计算基质评分(范围:-1,800.51 - 1,901.99)、免疫评分(范围:-1,476.28 - 3,780.33)、估计评分(范围:-2,618.28 - 5,098.14)和肿瘤纯度(范围:0.216 - 0.976),它们与免疫亚型显著相关(Kruskal-Wallis检验,< 0.001)。高免疫组倾向于具有更高水平的HLA和免疫检查点基因表达(Kruskal-Wallis检验,< 0.05)。高免疫组具有最高水平的幼稚B细胞、静息树突状细胞、M1巨噬细胞、静息自然杀伤细胞、浆细胞、CD4记忆激活T细胞、CD8 T细胞、滤泡辅助性T细胞和调节性T细胞,而低免疫组具有更好的总生存期。在高免疫组中鉴定出的基因本体(GO)术语主要与免疫相关。总之,免疫特征相关的皮肤黑色素瘤亚型在皮肤黑色素瘤预后分层中起作用。免疫特征相关的皮肤黑色素瘤亚型的构建预测了可能的患者预后,并提供了可能的免疫治疗候选方案。