Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Department of Microbiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Feb 17;65(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02019-20.
Fluconazole has been associated with higher mortality compared with the echinocandins in patients treated for invasive candida infections. Underexposure from current fluconazole dosing regimens may contribute to these worse outcomes, so alternative dosing strategies require study. The objective of this study was to evaluate fluconazole drug exposure in critically ill patients comparing a novel model-optimized dose selection method with established approaches over a standard 14-day (336-h) treatment course. Target attainment was evaluated in a representative population of 1,000 critically ill adult patients for (i) guideline dosing (800-mg loading and 400-mg maintenance dosing adjusted to renal function), (ii) guideline dosing followed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dose adjustment, and (iii) model-optimized dose selection based on patient factors (without TDM). Assuming a MIC of 2 mg/liter, free fluconazole 24-h area under the curve (fAUC) targets of ≥200 mg · h/liter and <800 mg · h/liter were used for assessment of target attainment. Guideline dosing resulted in underexposure in 21% of patients at 48 h and in 23% of patients at 336 h. The TDM-guided strategy did not influence 0- to 48-h target attainment due to inherent procedural delays but resulted in 37% of patients being underexposed at 336 h. Model-optimized dosing resulted in ≥98% of patients meeting efficacy targets throughout the treatment course, while resulting in less overexposure compared with guideline dosing (7% versus 14%) at 336 h. Model-optimized dose selection enables fluconazole dose individualization in critical illness from the outset of therapy and should enable reevaluation of the comparative effectiveness of this drug in patients with severe fungal infections.
氟康唑与棘白菌素类药物相比,在治疗侵袭性念珠菌感染的患者中与更高的死亡率相关。目前氟康唑的给药方案可能导致剂量不足,从而导致这些不良结局,因此需要研究替代的给药策略。本研究的目的是评估在危重患者中氟康唑的药物暴露情况,比较一种新的模型优化剂量选择方法与在标准的 14 天(336 小时)治疗过程中使用的既定方法。在 1000 例代表性的成年危重患者中,评估了(i)指南剂量(根据肾功能调整 800mg 负荷剂量和 400mg 维持剂量)、(ii)指南剂量加治疗药物监测(TDM)指导剂量调整和(iii)基于患者因素的模型优化剂量选择(不进行 TDM)的目标达标情况。假设 MIC 为 2mg/L,游离氟康唑 24 小时 AUC(fAUC)目标值为≥200mg·h/L 和<800mg·h/L 用于评估目标达标情况。在 48 小时和 336 小时时,分别有 21%和 23%的患者出现剂量不足。由于固有程序延迟,TDM 指导的策略并未影响 0 至 48 小时的目标达标情况,但导致 336 小时时 37%的患者剂量不足。模型优化剂量使在整个治疗过程中≥98%的患者达到了疗效目标,而与指南剂量相比,在 336 小时时的过度暴露更少(7%比 14%)。从治疗开始时,通过模型优化剂量选择可以实现危重患者中氟康唑的个体化剂量,这应该能够重新评估该药在严重真菌感染患者中的比较疗效。