Suppr超能文献

玄武岩纤维增强聚合物(BFRP)和玄武岩/碳纤维混杂增强聚合物(HFRP)筋材的拉伸与剪切试验

Tensile and Shear Testing of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) and Hybrid Basalt/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (HFRP) Bars.

作者信息

Protchenko Kostiantyn, Zayoud Fares, Urbański Marek, Szmigiera Elżbieta

机构信息

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 21;13(24):5839. doi: 10.3390/ma13245839.

Abstract

The use of sustainable materials is a challenging issue for the construction industry; thus, Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) is of interest to civil and structural engineers for their lightweight and high-strength properties. The paper describes the results of tensile and shear strength testing of Basalt FRP (BFRP) and Hybrid FRP (HFRP) bars. The combination of carbon fibers and basalt fibers leads to a more cost-efficient alternative to Carbon FRP (CFRP) and a more sustainable alternative to BFRP. The bars were subjected to both tensile and shear strength testing in order to investigate their structural behavior and find a correlation between the results. The results of the tests done on BFRP and HFRP bars showed that the mechanical properties of BFRP bars were lower than for HFRP bars. The maximum tensile strength obtained for a BFRP bar with a diameter of 10 mm was equal to approximately 1150 MPa, whereas for HFRP bars with a diameter of 8 mm, it was higher, approximately 1280 MPa. Additionally, better results were obtained for HFRP bars during shear testing; the average maximum shear stress was equal to 214 MPa, which was approximately 22% higher than the average maximum shear stress obtained for BFRP bars. However, HFRP bars exhibited the lowest shear strain of 57% that of BFRP bars. This confirms the effectiveness of using HFRP bars as a replacement for less rigid BFRP bars. It is worth mentioning that after obtaining these results, shear testing can be performed instead of tensile testing for future studies, which is less complicated and takes less time to prepare than tensile testing.

摘要

使用可持续材料对建筑业来说是一个具有挑战性的问题;因此,纤维增强聚合物(FRP)因其轻质和高强度特性而受到土木和结构工程师的关注。本文描述了玄武岩纤维增强聚合物(BFRP)和混杂纤维增强聚合物(HFRP)棒材的拉伸和抗剪强度测试结果。碳纤维和玄武岩纤维的组合产生了一种比碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)更具成本效益的替代品,以及一种比BFRP更具可持续性的替代品。对这些棒材进行了拉伸和抗剪强度测试,以研究其结构性能并找出结果之间的相关性。对BFRP和HFRP棒材进行的测试结果表明,BFRP棒材的力学性能低于HFRP棒材。直径为10毫米的BFRP棒材获得的最大抗拉强度约为1150兆帕,而直径为8毫米的HFRP棒材的最大抗拉强度更高,约为1280兆帕。此外,HFRP棒材在抗剪测试中取得了更好的结果;平均最大剪应力为214兆帕,比BFRP棒材获得的平均最大剪应力高出约22%。然而,HFRP棒材的剪切应变最低,为BFRP棒材的57%。这证实了使用HFRP棒材替代刚性较差的BFRP棒材的有效性。值得一提的是,在获得这些结果之后,未来的研究可以进行抗剪测试而非拉伸测试,因为抗剪测试比拉伸测试更简单,准备时间也更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e97/7767474/fc61e3baf335/materials-13-05839-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验