De Silva Sakuni M, Deraniyagala Samitha, Walpita Janitha K, Jayaweera Indira, Diyabalanage Saranga, Cooray Asitha T
Instrument Centre, Office of the Dean, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
J Anal Methods Chem. 2020 Dec 18;2020:6683309. doi: 10.1155/2020/6683309. eCollection 2020.
Fluoride is a common anion present in natural waters. Among many analytical methods used for the quantification of fluoride in natural waters, potentiometric analysis is one of the most widely used methods because of minimum interferences from other ions commonly present in natural waters. The potentiometric analysis requires the use of ionic strength adjusting buffer abbreviated as TISAB to obtain accurate and reproducible data. In most of the reported literature, higher concentrations of strong metal chelating ligands are used as masking agents generally in the concentration range of 1.0 to 0.01 M. In the present study, effectiveness of the masking agents, phosphate, citrate, CDTA ((1,2-cyclohexylenedinitrilo)tetraacetic acid), EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) HE-EDTA ((hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetic acid)), triethanolamine, and tartaric acid at 1.0 mM in TISAB solutions was investigated. The experimental data were compared with a commercially available WTW 140100 TISAB solution as the reference buffer. According to the experimental data, the reference buffer always produced the highest fluoride concentrations and the measured fluoride concentrations were in the range of 0.611 to 1.956 mg/L. Out of all the masking agents investigated, only CDTA performed marginally well and approximately a quarter of the samples produced statistically comparable data to the reference buffer. All the other masking agents produced significantly low concentrations compared to the reference buffer. The most probable reasons for the underestimation of fluoride concentrations could be shorter decomplexing time and lower masking agent concentrations.
氟化物是天然水体中常见的阴离子。在用于定量分析天然水体中氟化物的众多分析方法中,电位分析法是应用最广泛的方法之一,因为它受天然水体中常见其他离子的干扰最小。电位分析需要使用离子强度调节缓冲液(简称为TISAB)来获得准确且可重复的数据。在大多数已发表的文献中,通常使用浓度范围为1.0至0.01 M的高浓度强金属螯合配体作为掩蔽剂。在本研究中,研究了在TISAB溶液中浓度为1.0 mM的掩蔽剂磷酸盐、柠檬酸盐、环已二胺四乙酸(CDTA)、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、羟乙基乙二胺三乙酸(HE-EDTA)、三乙醇胺和酒石酸的有效性。将实验数据与市售的WTW 140100 TISAB溶液作为参比缓冲液进行比较。根据实验数据,参比缓冲液始终产生最高的氟化物浓度,测得的氟化物浓度范围为0.611至1.956 mg/L。在所有研究的掩蔽剂中,只有CDTA表现稍好,约四分之一的样品产生了与参比缓冲液在统计学上可比的数据。与参比缓冲液相比,所有其他掩蔽剂产生的浓度都显著较低。氟化物浓度被低估的最可能原因可能是解络合时间较短和掩蔽剂浓度较低。