Ssebagereka Anthony, Apolot Rebecca Racheal, Nyachwo Evelyne Baelvina, Ekirapa-Kiracho Elizabeth
Department of Health Policy, Planning, and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, New Mulago Hospital Complex, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 2;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01335-9.
This paper aimed at estimating the resources required to implement a community Score Card by a typical rural district health team in Uganda, as a mechanism for fostering accountability, utilization and quality of maternal and child healthcare service.
This costing analysis was done from the payer's perspective using the ingredients approach over five quarterly rounds of scoring between 2017 and 2018. Expenditure data was obtained from project records, entered and analyzed in Microsoft excel. Two scale-up scenarios, scenario one (considered cost inputs by the MakSPH research teams) and scenario two (considering cost inputs based on contextual knowledge from district implementing teams), were simulated to better understand the cost implications of integrating the Community Score Card (CSC) into a district health system.
The total and average cost of implementing CSC for five quarterly rounds over a period of 18 months were USD 59,962 and USD 11,992 per round of scoring, respectively. Considering the six sub-counties (including one Town Council) in Kibuku district that were included in this analysis, the average cost of implementating the CSC in each sub-county was USD 1998 per scoring round. Scaling-up of the intervention across the entire district (included 22 sub-counties) under the first scenario would cost a total of USD 19,003 per scoring round. Under the second scaleup scenario, the cost would be lower at USD 7116. The total annual cost of scaling CSC in the entire district would be USD 76,012 under scenario one compared to USD 28,465 under scenario two. The main cost drivers identified were transportation costs, coordination and supervision costs, and technical support to supplement local implementers.
Our analysis suggests that it is financially feasible to implement and scale-up the CSC initiative, as an accountability tool for enhancing service delivery. However, the CSC design and approach needs to be embedded within local systems and implemented in collaboration with existing stakeholders so as to optimise costs. A comprehensive economic analysis of the costs associated with transportation, involvement of the district teams in coordination, supervision as well as provision of technical support is necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness of the CSC approach.
本文旨在估算乌干达一个典型农村地区卫生团队实施社区计分卡所需的资源,该计分卡作为一种促进孕产妇和儿童医疗服务问责制、利用率和质量的机制。
本成本分析从付款方的角度出发,采用要素法,对2017年至2018年期间的五个季度评分轮次进行分析。支出数据从项目记录中获取,并在Microsoft excel中录入和分析。模拟了两种扩大规模的情景,情景一(由马克斯普朗克公共卫生研究所研究团队考虑成本投入)和情景二(根据地区实施团队的背景知识考虑成本投入),以更好地了解将社区计分卡(CSC)纳入地区卫生系统的成本影响。
在18个月的时间内进行五个季度轮次的CSC实施的总成本和平均成本分别为59,962美元和每轮评分11,992美元。考虑到纳入本分析的基布库区的六个次县(包括一个镇议会),每个次县实施CSC的平均成本为每轮评分1998美元。在第一种情景下,在整个地区(包括22个次县)扩大干预规模,每轮评分的总成本将为19,003美元。在第二种扩大规模情景下,成本将更低,为7116美元。在情景一下,在整个地区扩大CSC的年度总成本将为76,012美元,而在情景二下为28,465美元。确定的主要成本驱动因素是运输成本、协调和监督成本以及补充当地实施人员的技术支持。
我们的分析表明,作为一种加强服务提供的问责工具,实施和扩大CSC倡议在财务上是可行的。然而,CSC的设计和方法需要融入当地系统,并与现有利益相关者合作实施,以优化成本。有必要对与运输、地区团队参与协调、监督以及提供技术支持相关的成本进行全面的经济分析,以确定CSC方法的成本效益。