Comparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Comparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Mar;88:104700. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104700. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
High allelic polymorphism and association with disease susceptibility has made the genes encoding major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen presentation molecules in humans, domesticated animals, and wildlife species of wide interest to ecologists, evolutionary biologists, and health specialists. The often multifaceted polygenism and extreme polymorphism of this immunogenetic system have made it especially difficult to characterize in non-model species. Here we compare and contrast the workflows of traditional Sanger sequencing of plasmid-cloned amplicons to Pacific Biosciences SMRT circular consensus sequencing (CCS) in their ability to capture alleles of MHC class I in a wildlife species where characterization of these genes was absent. We assessed two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), a species suffering from a high prevalence of an aggressive cancer associated with a sexually transmitted gamma herpesvirus. In this pilot study, SMRT CCS proved superior in identifying more alleles from each animal than the more laborious plasmid cloning/Sanger workflow (12:7, 10:7), and no alleles were identified with the cloning/Sanger approach that were not identified by SMRT CCS. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach including cost, allele rarefaction, and sequence fidelity.
高度的等位基因多态性和与疾病易感性的关联,使得编码主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)抗原呈递分子的基因成为生态学家、进化生物学家和健康专家广泛关注的对象。这种免疫遗传系统的多态性和极端多态性往往非常复杂,使得在非模式物种中进行特征描述变得尤为困难。在这里,我们比较和对比了传统的质粒克隆扩增子 Sanger 测序与太平洋生物科学公司 SMRT 环状一致测序(CCS)在捕获野生动物物种 MHC Ⅰ类等位基因方面的工作流程,这些基因在该物种中尚未得到描述。我们评估了两只加利福尼亚海狮(Zalophus californianus),这是一种患有高发性侵袭性癌症的物种,这种癌症与一种性传播的γ疱疹病毒有关。在这项初步研究中,SMRT CCS 在从每个动物中识别更多等位基因方面优于更费力的质粒克隆/Sanger 工作流程(12:7、10:7),并且没有通过克隆/Sanger 方法识别的等位基因是不能通过 SMRT CCS 识别的。我们讨论了每种方法的优缺点,包括成本、等位基因稀疏度和序列保真度。