Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, 10# Changjiang Zhilu Daping, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400042, People's Republic of China.
Updates Surg. 2021 Aug;73(4):1549-1558. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00954-9. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
This study aimed to investigate risk factors of conversion to thoracotomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) underwent robotic- (RATS) or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
A retrospective review was conducted to included consecutive participants from January 2016 to December 2018. Three groups [mini-invasive, conversion, and up-front open thoracotomy (OT) groups] and two series of comparison (conversion versus mini-invasive, and conversion versus OT) were generated. Propensity score-matched analysis (1:1) was conducted to verify outcomes of complications and perioperative factors. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors of conversion.
1177 patients (912 in mini-invasive group, 180 in conversion group, and 85 in OT group) were included. The overall conversion rate was 16.5%. Robotic approach resulted in dramatically lower conversion rate compared to VATS (2.4% vs 25.1%, p < 0.001). After propensity adjustment, no significant difference of complication rates was identified when comparing conversion group with mini-invasive and OT groups. Multivariate regression analyses shown that robotic approach (odd ratio (OR) = 0.037, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.016-0.087), tumor size < 5 cm (OR = 0.274, 95% CI 0.152-0.493), no chief symptom(OR = 0.311, 95% CI 0.178-0.545), body mass index < 25 kg/m (OR = 0.537, 95% CI 0.343-0.842), and lobectomy (OR = 0.079, 95% CI 0.017-0.370) were independent protectors of conversion.
Seven demographic factors might be recognized as independent predictors of conversion. For patients with highly risk of conversion, robotic approach is recommended to perform mini-invasive pulmonary surgery over VATS.
本研究旨在探讨接受机器人辅助 (RATS) 或电视辅助胸腔镜手术 (VATS) 治疗非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 的患者转为开胸手术的风险因素。
回顾性分析 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月连续纳入的患者。共分为三组[微创组、中转组和 upfront 开胸手术 (OT) 组]和两组对比[中转组与微创组、中转组与 OT 组]。采用倾向评分匹配分析 (1:1) 比较并发症和围手术期因素。采用多变量二项逻辑回归分析识别中转的潜在危险因素。
共纳入 1177 例患者(微创组 912 例,中转组 180 例,OT 组 85 例)。总体中转率为 16.5%。与 VATS 相比,机器人手术显著降低了中转率(2.4% vs 25.1%,p<0.001)。在倾向评分调整后,与微创组和 OT 组相比,中转组的并发症发生率无显著差异。多变量回归分析显示,机器人手术(比值比 (OR) = 0.037,95%置信区间 (CI) 0.016-0.087)、肿瘤大小<5 cm(OR = 0.274,95% CI 0.152-0.493)、无主要症状(OR = 0.311,95% CI 0.178-0.545)、体重指数<25 kg/m(OR = 0.537,95% CI 0.343-0.842)和肺叶切除术(OR = 0.079,95% CI 0.017-0.370)是中转的独立保护因素。
7 个人口统计学因素可能被认为是中转的独立预测因子。对于中转风险较高的患者,建议机器人辅助手术替代 VATS 进行微创肺手术。