Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 5;110(12):1176-1179. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.15411.
Triage and rationing of scarce intensive care unit (ICU) resources are an unavoidable necessity. In routine circumstances, ICU triage is premised on the best interests of an individual patient; however, when increased demand exceeds capacity, as during an infectious disease outbreak, healthcare providers need to make difficult decisions to benefit the broader community while still respecting individual interests. We are currently living through an unprecedented period, with South Africa (SA) facing the challenges of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa (CCSSA) expedited the development of a triage guidance document to inform the appropriate and fair use of scarce ICU resources during this pandemic. Triage decision-making is based on the clinical odds of a positive ICU outcome, balanced against the risk of mortality and longer-term morbidity affecting quality of life. Factors such as age and comorbid conditions are considered for their potential impact on clinical outcome, but are never the sole criteria for denying ICU-level care. Arbitrary, unfair discrimination is never condoned. The CCSSA COVID-19 triage guideline is aligned with SA law and international ethical standards, and upholds respect for all persons. The Bill of Rights, however, does not mandate the level of care enshrined in the constitutional right to healthcare. ICU admission is not always appropriate, available or feasible for every person suffering critical illness or injury; however, everyone has the right to receive appropriate healthcare at another level. If ICU resources are used for people who do not stand to benefit, this effectively denies others access to potentially life-saving healthcare. Appropriate triaging can therefore be considered a constitutional imperative.
分诊和稀缺重症监护病房(ICU)资源的配给是不可避免的。在常规情况下,ICU 分诊是基于对个体患者最佳利益的考虑;然而,当需求增加超过能力时,就像传染病爆发期间一样,医疗保健提供者需要做出艰难的决策,以造福更广泛的社区,同时仍尊重个人利益。我们目前正经历着一个前所未有的时期,南非(SA)正面临着全球 COVID-19 大流行的挑战。南部非洲重症监护学会(CCSSA)加快了分诊指导文件的制定,以便在大流行期间为适当和公平地使用稀缺的 ICU 资源提供信息。分诊决策是基于 ICU 结局阳性的临床可能性,与死亡率和影响生活质量的长期发病率风险相平衡。年龄和合并症等因素被考虑用于其对临床结局的潜在影响,但绝不是拒绝 ICU 级护理的唯一标准。任意、不公平的歧视是绝不允许的。CCSSA COVID-19 分诊指南与南非法律和国际伦理标准一致,并坚持尊重所有人。然而,《权利法案》并没有规定宪法赋予的医疗保健权利所包含的护理水平。并非每个患有重病或重伤的人都适合、可获得或可行 ICU 入院治疗;然而,每个人都有权在另一个层面上获得适当的医疗保健。如果 ICU 资源被用于不会从中受益的人,这实际上剥夺了其他人获得潜在救生医疗保健的机会。因此,适当的分诊可以被认为是一项宪法要求。